People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Vermang, Bart
General Electric (Finland)
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (33/33 displayed)
- 2024Radiation versus environmental degradation in unencapsulated metal halide perovskite solar cellscitations
- 2024Toward Mass Production of Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Solar Cells: Scalable Growth of Photovoltaic-Grade Multilayer WSe2 by Tungsten Selenizationcitations
- 2024Rear Surface Passivation for Ink-Based, Submicron CuIn(S, Se)2 Solar Cellscitations
- 2024Liâ€Doping and Agâ€Alloying Interplay Shows the Pathway for Kesterite Solar Cells with Efficiency Over 14%citations
- 2024Toward Mass Production of Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Solar Cells: Scalable Growth of Photovoltaic-Grade Multilayer WSe2by Tungsten Selenization.citations
- 2024Li-doping and Ag-alloying interplay shows the pathway for kesterite solar cells with efficiency over 14%citations
- 2024Li-doping and Ag-alloying interplay shows the pathway for kesterite solar cells with efficiency over 14%citations
- 2023Ge-alloyed kesterite thin-film solar cells: previous investigations and current status – a comprehensive reviewcitations
- 2023Towards market commercialization: Lifecycle economic and environmental evaluation of scalable perovskite solar cellscitations
- 2023Facile Aqueous Solution-Gel route toward Thin Film CuBi2O4 Photocathodes for Solar Hydrogen Productioncitations
- 2023Ultrasonic spray coating of kesterite CZTS films from molecular inkscitations
- 2023Controlled li alloying by postsynthesis electrochemical treatment of Cu 2 ZnSn(S, Se) 4 absorbers for solar cellscitations
- 2022A study of quenching approaches to optimize ultrasonic spray coated perovskite layers scalable for PVcitations
- 2022Relevance of Ge incorporation to control the physical behaviour of point defects in kesteritecitations
- 2021Comparative study of Al2O3 and HfO2 for surface passivation of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin-films: An innovative Al2O3/HfO2 multi-stack designcitations
- 2021Comparative Study of Al2O3 and HfO2 for Surface Passivation of Cu(In,Ga)Se-2 Thin Films: An Innovative Al2O3/HfO2 Multistack Designcitations
- 2021A multi-stack Al2O3/HfO2 design with contact openings for front surface of Cu(In,Ga)Se-2 solar cellscitations
- 2021Revealing the electronic structure, heterojunction band offset and alignment of Cu2ZnGeSe4: a combined experimental and computational study towards photovoltaic applicationscitations
- 2020Investigating the electronic properties of Al2O3/Cu(In, Ga)Se-2 interfacecitations
- 2020Optical Lithography Patterning of SiO 2 Layers for Interface Passivation of Thin Film Solar Cellscitations
- 2020Growth of Sb2Se3 thin films by selenization of RF sputtered binary precursorscitations
- 2019A Study of the Degradation Mechanisms of Ultra Thin CIGS Solar Cells Submitted to a Damp Heat Environment
- 2019Crystallization properties of Cu2ZnGeSe4citations
- 2018Passivation of Interfaces in Thin Film Solar Cells: Understanding the Effects of a Nanostructured Rear Point Contact Layercitations
- 2018Optical Lithography Patterning of SiO<sub>2</sub> Layers for Interface Passivation of Thin Film Solar Cellscitations
- 2018Growth of Sb2Se3 thin films by selenization of RF sputtered binary precursors
- 2018Optical Lithography Patterning of SiO2 Layers for Interface Passivation of Thin Film Solar Cellscitations
- 2017Optimisation of rear reflectance in ultra-thin CIGS solar cells towards>20% efficiencycitations
- 2017Effect of the duration of a wet KCN etching step and post deposition annealing on the efficiency of Cu2ZnSnSe4 solar cellscitations
- 2016Progress in Cleaning and Wet Processing for Kesterite Thin Film Solar Cellscitations
- 2015Investigating the electronic properties of Al2O3/Cu(In, Ga)Se-2 interfacecitations
- 2014Potential-induced optimization of ultra-thin rear surface passivated CIGS solar cellscitations
- 2013Development of Rear Surface Passivated Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Thin Film Solar Cells with Nano-Sized Local Rear Point Contactscitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Passivation of Interfaces in Thin Film Solar Cells: Understanding the Effects of a Nanostructured Rear Point Contact Layer
Abstract
<p>Thin film solar cells based in Cu(In,Ga)Se<sub>2</sub> (CIGS) are among the most efficient polycrystalline solar cells, surpassing CdTe and even polycrystalline silicon solar cells. For further developments, the CIGS technology has to start incorporating different solar cell architectures and strategies that allow for very low interface recombination. In this work, ultrathin 350 nm CIGS solar cells with a rear interface passivation strategy are studied and characterized. The rear passivation is achieved using an Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> nanopatterned point structure. Using the cell results, photoluminescence measurements, and detailed optical simulations based on the experimental results, it is shown that by including the nanopatterned point contact structure, the interface defect concentration lowers, which ultimately leads to an increase of solar cell electrical performance mostly by increase of the open circuit voltage. Gains to the short circuit current are distributed between an increased rear optical reflection and also due to electrical effects. The approach of mixing several techniques allows us to make a discussion considering the different passivation gains, which has not been done in detail in previous works. A solar cell with a nanopatterned rear contact and a 350 nm thick CIGS absorber provides an average power conversion efficiency close to 10%.</p>