Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Sirrenberg, Marc

  • Google
  • 2
  • 8
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2024The High Temperature Strength of Single Crystal Ni‐base Superalloys – Re‐visiting Constant Strain Rate, Creep, and Thermomechanical Fatigue Testingcitations
  • 2024The High Temperature Strength of Single Crystal Ni‐base Superalloys – Re‐visiting Constant Strain Rate, Creep, and Thermomechanical Fatigue Testingcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Babinský, Tomás
2 / 2 shared
Parsa, Alireza B.
2 / 3 shared
Eggeler, Gunther
2 / 193 shared
Guth, Stefan
2 / 8 shared
Bürger, David
2 / 4 shared
Mills, Michael J.
2 / 7 shared
Dlouhý, Antonin
2 / 2 shared
Thome, Pascal
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Babinský, Tomás
  • Parsa, Alireza B.
  • Eggeler, Gunther
  • Guth, Stefan
  • Bürger, David
  • Mills, Michael J.
  • Dlouhý, Antonin
  • Thome, Pascal
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

The High Temperature Strength of Single Crystal Ni‐base Superalloys – Re‐visiting Constant Strain Rate, Creep, and Thermomechanical Fatigue Testing

  • Babinský, Tomás
  • Sirrenberg, Marc
  • Parsa, Alireza B.
  • Eggeler, Gunther
  • Guth, Stefan
  • Bürger, David
  • Mills, Michael J.
  • Dlouhý, Antonin
Abstract

<jats:p>The present work takes a new look at the high temperature strength of single crystal (SX) Ni‐base superalloys. It compares high temperature constant strain rate (CSR) testing, creep testing, and out‐of‐phase thermomechanical fatigue (OP TMF) testing, which represent key characterization methods supporting alloy development and component design in SX material science and technology. The three types of tests are compared using the same SX alloy, working with precisely oriented &lt;001&gt;‐specimens and considering the same temperature range between 1023 and 1223 K, where climb controlled micro‐creep processes need to be considered. Nevertheless, the three types of tests provide different types of information. CSR testing at imposed strain rates of 3.3 × 10<jats:sup>−4</jats:sup> s<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> shows a yield stress anomaly (YSA) with a YSA stress peak at a temperature of 1073 K. This increase of strength with increasing temperature is not observed during constant load creep testing at much lower deformation rates around 10<jats:sup>−7</jats:sup> s<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>. Creep rates show a usual behavior and increase with increasing temperatures. During OP‐TMF loading, the temperature continuously increases/decreases in the compression/tension part of the mechanical strain‐controlled cycle (±0.5%). At the temperature, where the YSA peak stress temperature is observed, no peculiarities are observed. It is shown that OP‐TMF life is sensitive to surface quality, which is not the case in creep. A smaller number of cycles to failure is observed when reducing the heating rate in the compression/heating part of the mechanical strain‐controlled OP‐TMF cycle. The results are discussed on a microstructural basis, using results from scanning and transmission electron microscopy, and in light of previous work published in the literature.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • single crystal
  • phase
  • strength
  • fatigue
  • transmission electron microscopy
  • creep
  • fatigue testing
  • superalloy
  • high temperature strength