Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Hou, Yanan

  • Google
  • 1
  • 6
  • 6

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 20243D Printed PEEK Smart Polymer Nanocomposite Scaffolds: Mechanical, Self‐Sensing, and Biological Attributes6citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Koo, Joseph H.
1 / 4 shared
Schneider, Johannes
1 / 1 shared
Gadegaard, Nikolaj
1 / 12 shared
Basak, Srijani
1 / 1 shared
Kumar, S.
1 / 105 shared
Wardle, Brian L.
1 / 28 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Koo, Joseph H.
  • Schneider, Johannes
  • Gadegaard, Nikolaj
  • Basak, Srijani
  • Kumar, S.
  • Wardle, Brian L.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

3D Printed PEEK Smart Polymer Nanocomposite Scaffolds: Mechanical, Self‐Sensing, and Biological Attributes

  • Koo, Joseph H.
  • Schneider, Johannes
  • Gadegaard, Nikolaj
  • Hou, Yanan
  • Basak, Srijani
  • Kumar, S.
  • Wardle, Brian L.
Abstract

<jats:p>This study demonstrates the mechanical, self‐sensing and biological characteristics of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) engineered 3D‐printed PEEK composite scaffolds, utilising custom‐made feedstocks. Microstructural analysis and macroscale testing reveal that the PEEK/CNT scaffolds with 6wt.% CNT content and 46% relative density, achieve a gauge factor of up to 75, a modulus of 0.64 GPa, and a compressive strength of 64 MPa. The PEEK/CNT2.5/GNP2.5 scaffolds evince still better performance, at a relative density of 73%, reporting a modulus of up to 1.1 GPa and a compressive strength of 122 MPa. Importantly, stability in mechanical and piezoresistive performance up to 500 cycles is noted, indicating a durable and reliable performance under cyclic loading. Murine pre‐osteoblast cells (MC3T3‐E1) are used to biologically characterise sulfonated scaffolds over 14 days. Cytotoxicity, DNA, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels are quantified through <jats:italic>in vitro</jats:italic> assays, evaluating cell viability, proliferation and osteogenic properties. Notably, PEEK/CNT 6wt.% scaffolds exhibit nearly 80% cytocompatibility, while PEEK/CNT2.5/GNP2.5 scaffolds reach nearly 100%. Both types of scaffolds support cell differentiation, as evidenced by elevated ALP levels. These findings carry significant promise in bone tissue engineering, paving the way for the development of adaptive, intelligent structural implants boasting enhanced biocompatibility and self‐sensing capabilities.</jats:p><jats:p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</jats:p>

Topics
  • nanocomposite
  • density
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • polymer
  • Carbon
  • nanotube
  • strength
  • biocompatibility