People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Lupone, Federico
Polytechnic University of Turin
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (8/8 displayed)
- 2024Selective Laser Sintering versus Multi Jet Fusion: A Comprehensive Comparison Study Based on the Properties of Glass Beads‐Reinforced Polyamide 12citations
- 2024Printability study by selective laser sintering of bio-based samples obtained by using PBS as polymeric matrixcitations
- 20243D printing of PBAT-based composites filled with agro-wastes via selective laser sinteringcitations
- 20233D Printing of Low-Filled Basalt PA12 and PP Filaments for Automotive Componentscitations
- 2023Preparation and 3D printability study of bio-based PBAT powder for selective laser sintering additive manufacturingcitations
- 2022Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic polymer composites
- 2022Experimental Characterization and Modeling of 3D Printed Continuous Carbon Fibers Composites with Different Fiber Orientation Produced by FFF Processcitations
- 2020Innovative processing route combining fused deposition modelling and laser writing for the manufacturing of multifunctional polyamide/carbon fiber compositescitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Selective Laser Sintering versus Multi Jet Fusion: A Comprehensive Comparison Study Based on the Properties of Glass Beads‐Reinforced Polyamide 12
Abstract
<jats:p>Selective laser sintering (SLS) and multi jet fusion (MJF) are the most widespread powder bed fusion additive manufacturing techniques for fabricating polymeric parts since they offer great design flexibility, productivity, and geometrical accuracy. However, these technologies differ in the thermal energy source used to melt the powders as well as the innovative use of printing agents featured in the latter one to promote material consolidation and to avoid thermal bleeding at the part contours. The use of a single powder made of glass beads‐reinforced polyamide 12 (PA12/GB) for the fabrication of MJF and SLS samples makes possible a systematic comparison of the printed parts properties. A thoughtful analysis of the microstructure and mechanical properties of the samples reveals differences and peculiarities between the two technologies. SLS exhibits lower porosity and higher mechanical performances when the parts are printed along the build plane thanks to the powerful heating ensured by the laser. In contrast, MJF samples show higher mechanical isotropy with great flexural and tensile behavior for vertically oriented parts. The role of glass beads in the material behavior is defined by their mechanical properties, meaning higher rigidity and lower strength compared to neat PA12, and fracture mechanism.</jats:p>