Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Cerniauskas, Gabrielis

  • Google
  • 2
  • 4
  • 54

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2023Tensile Properties of 3D‐Projected 4‐Polytopes: A New Class of Mechanical Metamaterial2citations
  • 2020Concrete confinement with TRM versus FRP jackets at elevated temperatures52citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Alam, Parvez
1 / 11 shared
Bournas, Dionysios
1 / 1 shared
Tetta, Z.
1 / 2 shared
Bisby, L. A.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Alam, Parvez
  • Bournas, Dionysios
  • Tetta, Z.
  • Bisby, L. A.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Tensile Properties of 3D‐Projected 4‐Polytopes: A New Class of Mechanical Metamaterial

  • Cerniauskas, Gabrielis
  • Alam, Parvez
Abstract

<jats:p>In this article, we research the tensile behavior mechanical metamaterial based on the 3D projections of 4D geometries (4‐polytopes). The specific properties of these mechanical metamaterials can be enhanced by more than fourfold when optimized within a framework powered by an evolutionary algorithm. We show that the best‐performing metamaterial structure, the 8‐cell (tesseract), has specific yield strength and specific stiffness values in a similar range to those of hexagonal honeycombs tested out‐of‐plane. The 8‐cell structures are also cubically symmetrical and have the same mechanical properties in three orthogonal axes. The effect of structure is quantified by comparing metamaterial tensile strength against the Young's modulus of constituent solid material. We find that the strength‐to‐modulus value of the 8‐cell structures exceeds that of the hexagonal honeycomb by 76%. The 5‐cell (pentatope) and 16‐cell (orthoplex) metamaterials are shown to be more effective under tensile loading than gyroid structures, while 24‐cell (octaplex) structures display the least optimal structure‐properties relationships. The findings presented in this paper showcase the importance of macro‐scale architecture and highlight the potential of 3D projections of 4‐polytopes as the basis for a new class of mechanical metamaterial.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • strength
  • yield strength
  • tensile strength
  • metamaterial
  • gyroid