Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Aberoumand, Mohammad

  • Google
  • 11
  • 13
  • 553

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (11/11 displayed)

  • 20244D printing and annealing of PETG composites reinforced with short carbon fibers34citations
  • 2024Influence of Programming and Recovery Parameters on Compressive Behaviors of 4D‐Printed Biocompatible Polyvinyl Chloride or Vinyl–Poly(ε‐Caprolactone) Blends3citations
  • 2024Effects of TPU on the mechanical properties, fracture toughness, morphology, and thermal analysis of 3D-printed ABS-TPU blends by FDM17citations
  • 20244D printing of porous PLA-TPU structures: effect of applied deformation, loading mode and infill pattern on the shape memory performance76citations
  • 20234D Printing‐Encapsulated Polycaprolactone–Thermoplastic Polyurethane with High Shape Memory Performances72citations
  • 2023Development of Pure Poly Vinyl Chloride (PVC) with Excellent 3D Printability and Macro‐ and Micro‐Structural Properties77citations
  • 2023Shape memory performance assessment of FDM 3D printed PLA-TPU composites by Box-Behnken response surface methodology93citations
  • 20234D Printing of Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC): A Detailed Analysis of Microstructure, Programming, and Shape Memory Performance64citations
  • 2022A New Strategy for Achieving Shape Memory Effects in 4D Printed Two-Layer Composite Structures69citations
  • 2021Mechanical Characterization of Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) 3D Printed Parts20citations
  • 20214D Printing by Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM)28citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Rahmatabadi, Davood
7 / 11 shared
Bodaghi, Mahdi
9 / 46 shared
Bashi, Mahshid Fallah Min
1 / 1 shared
Soleyman, Elyas
9 / 9 shared
Abrinia, Karen
9 / 11 shared
Ghasemi, Ismaeil
9 / 14 shared
Soltanmohammadi, Kianoosh
9 / 9 shared
Baniassadi, Majid
7 / 10 shared
Baghani, Mostafa
5 / 6 shared
Pahlavani, Mostafa
1 / 1 shared
Zolfagharian, Ali
1 / 13 shared
Moradi, Mahmoud
2 / 83 shared
Aminzadeh, Ahmad
2 / 5 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023
2022
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Rahmatabadi, Davood
  • Bodaghi, Mahdi
  • Bashi, Mahshid Fallah Min
  • Soleyman, Elyas
  • Abrinia, Karen
  • Ghasemi, Ismaeil
  • Soltanmohammadi, Kianoosh
  • Baniassadi, Majid
  • Baghani, Mostafa
  • Pahlavani, Mostafa
  • Zolfagharian, Ali
  • Moradi, Mahmoud
  • Aminzadeh, Ahmad
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

4D Printing‐Encapsulated Polycaprolactone–Thermoplastic Polyurethane with High Shape Memory Performances

  • Rahmatabadi, Davood
  • Baghani, Mostafa
  • Bodaghi, Mahdi
  • Soleyman, Elyas
  • Abrinia, Karen
  • Ghasemi, Ismaeil
  • Aberoumand, Mohammad
  • Baniassadi, Majid
  • Soltanmohammadi, Kianoosh
Abstract

<jats:sec><jats:label /><jats:p>There are a few shape memory polymers (SMPs) like polylactic acid (PLA) and polyurethane (PU) that are 4D printable, and other SMPs must be synthesized with a complicated chemical lab effort. Herein, considering dual‐material extrusion printing and microscopic mechanism behind shape memory effect (SME), bilayer‐encapsulated polycaprolactone (PCL)–thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) shape memory composite structures are 4D printed for the first time. The SME performance is investigated by assessing fixity, shape recovery, stress recovery, and stress relaxation under bending and compression loading modes. PCL, TPU, and melting temperature of PCL play the role of switching phase, net point, and transition temperature, respectively. Due to the destruction and dripping of molten PCL in contact with water, PCL is encapsulated by TPU. Encapsulation successfully solves the challenge of bonding/interface between printed layers, and the results show that the SME performance of the encapsulated structures is higher than bilayer PCL–TPU one's. Experiments reveal that maximum stress recovery in 4D‐printed composites remains constant over time. This is a great achievement compared to the previous extrusion‐based SMP structures that have great weakness in stress relaxation due to weak and low crystalline fractions and the unraveling of molecular entanglements in semicrystalline and amorphous thermoplastic SMPs, respectively.</jats:p></jats:sec>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • amorphous
  • phase
  • experiment
  • extrusion
  • composite
  • size-exclusion chromatography
  • melting temperature
  • material extrusion
  • semicrystalline
  • amorphous thermoplastic