Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Alkendi, Yusra

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 73

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2020Controlling the properties of additively manufactured cellular structures using machine learning approaches73citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Zweiri, Yahya
1 / 3 shared
Essa, Khamis
1 / 46 shared
Hassanin, Hany
1 / 19 shared
El-Sayed, Mahmoud
1 / 5 shared
Chart of publication period
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Zweiri, Yahya
  • Essa, Khamis
  • Hassanin, Hany
  • El-Sayed, Mahmoud
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Controlling the properties of additively manufactured cellular structures using machine learning approaches

  • Zweiri, Yahya
  • Essa, Khamis
  • Hassanin, Hany
  • Alkendi, Yusra
  • El-Sayed, Mahmoud
Abstract

Cellular structures are lightweight-engineered materials that have gained much attention with the development of additive manufacturing technologies. This paper introduces a precise approach to predict the mechanical properties of additively manufactured lattice structures using deep learning approaches. Diamond shaped nodal lattice structures were designed by varying strut length, strut diameter and strut orientation angle. The samples were manufactured using laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) of Ti-64 alloy and subjected to compression testing to measure the ultimate strength, elastic modulus, and specific strength. Machine learning approaches such as shallow neural network (SNN), deep neural network (DNN), and deep learning neural network (DLNN) were developed and compared to the statistical design of experiment (DoE) approach. The trained DLNN model showed the highest performance when compared to DNN, DoE and SNN with a mean percentage error of 5.26%, 14.60%, and 9.39% for the ultimate strength, elastic modulus, and specific strength, respectively. The DLNN model was used to create process maps, and was further validated. The results showed that although deep learning is preferred for big data, the optimised DLNN model outperformed the statistical DoE approach and can be a favourable tool for lattice structure prediction with limited data.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • experiment
  • strength
  • selective laser melting
  • machine learning