Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Songmuang, Rudee

  • Google
  • 1
  • 10
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2016A novel way of measuring lifetime at the nanometer scale using specific fast electron‐matter interactionscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Cazimajou, Thibault
1 / 1 shared
Chang, Huancheng
1 / 1 shared
Treussart, François
1 / 3 shared
Auzelle, Thomas
1 / 3 shared
Meuret, Sophie
1 / 6 shared
Gayral, Bruno
1 / 4 shared
Bourrellier, Romain
1 / 3 shared
Kociak, Mathieu
1 / 24 shared
Daudin, Bruno
1 / 9 shared
Tizei, Luiz
1 / 5 shared
Chart of publication period
2016

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Cazimajou, Thibault
  • Chang, Huancheng
  • Treussart, François
  • Auzelle, Thomas
  • Meuret, Sophie
  • Gayral, Bruno
  • Bourrellier, Romain
  • Kociak, Mathieu
  • Daudin, Bruno
  • Tizei, Luiz
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

A novel way of measuring lifetime at the nanometer scale using specific fast electron‐matter interactions

  • Cazimajou, Thibault
  • Songmuang, Rudee
  • Chang, Huancheng
  • Treussart, François
  • Auzelle, Thomas
  • Meuret, Sophie
  • Gayral, Bruno
  • Bourrellier, Romain
  • Kociak, Mathieu
  • Daudin, Bruno
  • Tizei, Luiz
Abstract

<jats:p>Charge carrier lifetime is a key parameter for understanding the physics of electronic or optical excitations. For example the excited state can unveil details of environmental influence, specifically the role of non‐radiative transitions. From a practical point of view, lifetimes can largely determine the performances of devices, such as Light Emitting Devices (LEDs) or photovoltaic cells. These usually rely on nanometer scale structures for which small details, such as the presence of single point defects, have to be known with atomic precision. Despite the success of super resolution optical microscopies, they fail as general tools for lifetime measurement at the nanometer scale. In this presentation we will show how we can take advantage of the nanometer probe size formed in a Transmission Electron Microscope and a phenomenon that we recently discovered (referred hereafter as the bunching effect [1]), to study lifetimes of emitter at the nanometer scale without using a pulsed electron gun.</jats:p><jats:p>The effect takes its name from the fact that the autocorrelation function g<jats:sup>(2)</jats:sup>(τ) of the CL signal coming from quantum emitters (points defects or more generally single photon emitters –SPE‐, quantum confined structures…) may exhibit a peak at zero delay – which is a fundamental difference with PL. To measure this effect, we use an intensity interferometry experiment that measures the CL g<jats:sup>(2)</jats:sup>(τ). Figure 1 shows that, at low incoming electron currents (I &lt; 100 pA), the g<jats:sup>(2)</jats:sup>(τ) of the CL signal intensity I(t) displays a large nanosecond‐range peak at zero delay (g<jats:sup>(2)</jats:sup>(0) &gt; 35) (bunching), the amplitude of which depends on the incoming electron current. This behavior strongly departs from the PL g<jats:sup>(2)</jats:sup>(τ) function which is flat when multiple independent SPE are excited. In this presentation we will show that it occurs because an emitter, like a quantum well, will be excited multiple times by a single electron and will emit a bunch of photons on a time window close to its radiative lifetime. As it will be proved, by simply fitting the experimental curve of the g<jats:sup>(2)</jats:sup>(τ) function by an exponential we can retrieve the lifetime of the emitter.</jats:p><jats:p>Using this effect we were therefore able to measure very efficiently lifetimes of Gallium Nitride quantum wells (QWs) separated by less than 15 nm, together with their emission energy and atomic structure (Figure 2). Experiments on well separated individual quantum structures shows an excellent agreement with combined time‐resolved μ‐photoluminescence. We also demonstrate the possibility to measure the lifetimes of emitters of different kinds (defects, QWs, bulk) within a distance of a tenth of nanometers even for spectrally overlapping emissions. This technique is readily applicable to large ensembles of single photon sources and various emitters such as QWs, quantum dots, point defects and extended defects, such as stacking faults (SF).</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • photoluminescence
  • experiment
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • nitride
  • quantum dot
  • stacking fault
  • Gallium
  • point defect
  • interferometry