Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.191 Topics available

To Map

979 Locations available

693.934 PEOPLE
693.934 People People
693.934 People

Show results for 693.934 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Soufivand, Anahita Ahmadi
  • 3
  • 14
  • 18
  • 2025
Fearraigh, B. Ó.
  • 2
  • 0
  • 14
  • 2025
Bhaswant, Maharshi
  • 1
  • 9
  • 4
  • 2025
Mouni, Lotfi
  • 5
  • 29
  • 28
  • 2025
Ghosh, Angsula
  • 1
  • 4
  • 0
  • 2025
Romero Resendiz, Liliana
  • 4
  • 23
  • 0
  • 2025
Mendesfelipe, Cristian
  • 2
  • 9
  • 264
  • 2025
Golias, EvangelosLund
  • 8
  • 60
  • 53
  • 2025
Pons, Tony
  • 7
  • 34
  • 38
  • 2025
Ferreira, Saulo Rocha
  • 8
  • 43
  • 92
  • 2025
Sanguineti, M.
  • 4
  • 0
  • 40
  • 2025
Ziegler, Andreas
  • 8
  • 43
  • 138
  • 2025
Zhang, Kailun
  • 2
  • 17
  • 6
  • 2025
Höfer, Philipp
  • 1
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Zhengis, Arshyn
  • 1
  • 4
  • 0
  • 2025
Danelon, Miguel R.
  • 1
  • 6
  • 1
  • 2025
Baral, P.
  • 2
  • 56
  • 12
  • 2025
Beltrán, Ana M.
  • 29
  • 140
  • 370
  • 2025
Vippola, MinnamariTampere
  • 58
  • 140
  • 1k
  • 2025
Perna, Alessia SerenaNaples
  • 7
  • 17
  • 66
  • 2025
Larsson, HenrikStockholm
  • 13
  • 50
  • 145
  • 2025
Kpemou, A. M.
  • 1
  • 8
  • 1
  • 2025
Le Gall, Alice
  • 16
  • 58
  • 69
  • 2025
Matteo, Pietro Di
  • 2
  • 11
  • 5
  • 2025
Kojouri, Ali Shivaie
  • 2
  • 13
  • 6
  • 2025

Park, Sang-Shin

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2025Critical Role of Rubber Functionalities on the Mechanical and Electrical Responses of Carbon Nanotube-Based Electroactive Rubber Composites2citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Yun, Jongwan
1 / 1 shared
Alam, Md Najib
1 / 1 shared
Azam, Siraj
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2025

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Yun, Jongwan
  • Alam, Md Najib
  • Azam, Siraj
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Critical Role of Rubber Functionalities on the Mechanical and Electrical Responses of Carbon Nanotube-Based Electroactive Rubber Composites

  • Yun, Jongwan
  • Park, Sang-Shin
  • Alam, Md Najib
  • Azam, Siraj

Abstract

Carbon nanomaterials, particularly carbon nanotubes (CNTs), are widely used as reinforcing fillers in rubber composites for advanced mechanical and electrical applications. However, the influence of rubber functionality and its interactions with CNTs remains underexplored. This study investigates electroactive elastomeric composites fabricated with CNTs in two common diene rubbers: natural rubber (NR) and acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber (NBR), each with distinct functionalities. For NR-based composites containing 2 vol% CNTs, mechanical properties, such as elastic modulus (2.24 MPa), tensile strength (12.48 MPa), and fracture toughness (26.92 MJ/m3), show significant improvements of 125%, 215%, and 164%, respectively, compared to unfilled rubber. Similarly, for NBR-based composites, the elastic modulus (5.46 MPa), tensile strength (13.47 MPa), and fracture toughness (82.89 MJ/m3) increase by 94%, 22%, and 65%, respectively, over the unfilled system. Although NBR-based composites exhibit higher mechanical properties, NR systems show more significant improvements, suggesting stronger chemical bonding between NR chains and CNTs, as evidenced by dynamic mechanical, X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric, and thermodynamic analyses. The NBR-based composite at 1 vol% CNT content exhibits 261% higher piezoresistive strain sensitivity (GF = 65 at 0% ≤ Δε ≤ 200%) compared to the NR-based composite (GF = 18 at 0% ≤ Δε ≤ 200%). The highest gauge factor of 39,125 (1000% ≤ Δε ≤ 1220) was achieved in NBR-based composites with 1 vol% CNT content. However, 1.5 vol% CNT content in NBR provides better strain sensitivity and linearity than other composites. Additionally, NBR demonstrates superior electromechanical actuation properties, with 1317% higher actuation displacement and 276% higher electromechanical pressure compared to NR at an applied electric field of 12 kV. Due to the stronger chemical bonding between the rubber and CNT, NR-based composites are more suitable for dynamic mechanical applications. In contrast, NBR-based ...

Topics

  • composite
  • strength
  • Carbon
  • nanotube
  • x-ray diffraction
  • elastomer
  • fracture toughness
  • tensile strength
  • rubber