Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Wellach, S.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2017FCC of upgraded pyrolysis liquids mixed with crude oil distillates: strategies for improving bio-fuels quality and minimizing production costscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Mirodatos, C.
1 / 13 shared
Schuurman, Y.
1 / 15 shared
Venderbosch, R.
1 / 1 shared
Chapelliere, Y.
1 / 3 shared
Jordan, E.
1 / 1 shared
Tuel, A.
1 / 13 shared
Chart of publication period
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Mirodatos, C.
  • Schuurman, Y.
  • Venderbosch, R.
  • Chapelliere, Y.
  • Jordan, E.
  • Tuel, A.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

FCC of upgraded pyrolysis liquids mixed with crude oil distillates: strategies for improving bio-fuels quality and minimizing production costs

  • Wellach, S.
  • Mirodatos, C.
  • Schuurman, Y.
  • Venderbosch, R.
  • Chapelliere, Y.
  • Jordan, E.
  • Tuel, A.
Abstract

In order to meet the EU’s renewable energy targets by 2020 (up to 10% share in all forms of transportation fuels1), a realistic alternative to first generation bio-fuels is to produce hybrid bio/fossil fuels by co-refining biomass pyrolysis liquids (PL) with crude oil fractions in a conventional oil refinery2. However, co-refining may lead to severe changes in products quality, such as a higher aromaticity and residual oxygenates in the hybrid fuels that are produced. For the case of co-FCC (fluid catalytic cracking), various strategies can be implemented to limit those impacts along this complex value chain ranging from bio-mass to bio-gasoline.A first strategy was tested to preserve the gasoline yield and quality by implementing a PL hydrotreating prior to co-processing, to lower their oxygen content3. However, to reduce the cost impact of hydrogen consumption for severe hydrotreating levels, a balance in PL upgrading severity/efficiency has to be found4. This presentation will analyze the changes in conversion, yields and gasoline composition (aromatics/olefins vs saturated alkanes) as a function of the bio-oils hydrotreating severity, measured in a Micro Activity Test (MAT) reactor. It will be shown that a compromise can be reached between bio-oil upgrading severity and FCC products yields and quality (RON, PIONA analysis).A second strategy was to adapt the FCC catalysts to the presence of oxygenate molecules typical of the bio-feedstock still present in the upgraded pyrolytic liquids. To that end, Y zeolites, which are the main active component in FCC catalysts, were up-graded by creating a mesoporosity in addition to the microporosity to favor the diffusion of the large lignocellulosic fragments throughout the cracking catalysts, according various hierarchical post synthesis processes5,6. It will be shown that significant changes in the gasoline composition (essentially aromaticity, olefinicity, together with coke formation) can be achieved by these processes, based on major changes in porosity and intrinsic diffusivity of feed molecules.The never reported combined impact for these two strategies on the co-FCC efficiency will be discussed as a potential guideline for minimizing the cost of bio-oils upgrading and thereof the hybrid transportation fuels, while maintaining their quality.

Topics
  • pyrolysis
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • Oxygen
  • Hydrogen
  • porosity
  • diffusivity
  • alkane
  • intrinsic diffusivity