Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Kiiskinen, Harri

  • Google
  • 10
  • 26
  • 444

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (10/10 displayed)

  • 2023Formable cellulose-based webs enabled by foam forming technologycitations
  • 2023High consistency foam in pilot scalecitations
  • 2016Porous structure of fibre networks formed by a foaming process: a comparative study of different characterization techniques14citations
  • 2012Nano-fibrillated cellulose vs bacterial cellulosecitations
  • 2012High performance cellulose nanocomposites215citations
  • 2012High performance cellulose nanocomposites:Comparing the reinforcing ability of bacterial cellulose and nanofibrillated cellulose215citations
  • 2012Nano-fibrillated cellulose vs bacterial cellulose:Reinforcing ability of nanocellulose obtained topdown or bottom-upcitations
  • 2009Some insight on paper structure and properties with different drying conditionscitations
  • 2003On the mobility of flowing papermaking suspensions and its relationship to formationcitations
  • 2002On the mobility of flowing papermaking suspensions and its relationship to formationcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Hjelt, T.
1 / 4 shared
Lappalainen, Timo
1 / 7 shared
Jetsu, Petri
1 / 8 shared
Salminen, Kristian
1 / 6 shared
Kouko, Jarmo
1 / 14 shared
Prakash, Baranivignesh
1 / 3 shared
Pääkkönen, Elina
1 / 10 shared
Siilasto, Roope
1 / 1 shared
Ketoja, Jukka A.
1 / 17 shared
Al-Qararah, Ahmad M.
1 / 2 shared
Hjelt, Tuomo
1 / 6 shared
Ekman, Axel
1 / 1 shared
Timonen, Jussi
1 / 3 shared
Bismarck, Alexander
4 / 142 shared
Tammelin, Tekla
4 / 26 shared
Samela, Juha
4 / 4 shared
Lee, Koon-Yang
2 / 23 shared
Schlufter, Kerstin
2 / 2 shared
Schulfter, Kerstin
2 / 2 shared
Lee, Koon Yang
2 / 6 shared
Myllys, M.
1 / 1 shared
Keränen, Janne T.
1 / 7 shared
Kerekes, R.
1 / 1 shared
Martinez, D. M.
2 / 3 shared
Ahlman, A.-K.
2 / 2 shared
Kerekes, R. J.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2016
2012
2009
2003
2002

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Hjelt, T.
  • Lappalainen, Timo
  • Jetsu, Petri
  • Salminen, Kristian
  • Kouko, Jarmo
  • Prakash, Baranivignesh
  • Pääkkönen, Elina
  • Siilasto, Roope
  • Ketoja, Jukka A.
  • Al-Qararah, Ahmad M.
  • Hjelt, Tuomo
  • Ekman, Axel
  • Timonen, Jussi
  • Bismarck, Alexander
  • Tammelin, Tekla
  • Samela, Juha
  • Lee, Koon-Yang
  • Schlufter, Kerstin
  • Schulfter, Kerstin
  • Lee, Koon Yang
  • Myllys, M.
  • Keränen, Janne T.
  • Kerekes, R.
  • Martinez, D. M.
  • Ahlman, A.-K.
  • Kerekes, R. J.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Nano-fibrillated cellulose vs bacterial cellulose

  • Bismarck, Alexander
  • Tammelin, Tekla
  • Samela, Juha
  • Lee, Koon-Yang
  • Schlufter, Kerstin
  • Kiiskinen, Harri
Abstract

This work investigates the difference between nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) and bacterial cellulose (BC). BC possesses higher critical surface tension of 57 mN m-1 compared to NFC (41 mN m-1). The thermal degradation temperature of BC was also found to be higher than that of NFC, in both nitrogen and air atmosphere. These results are in good agreement with the higher crystallinity of BC based on area under the XRD spectra, measured to be 71% as compared to NFC of 41%. Both types of nanocellulose papers were found to possess similar tensile moduli and strengths of 12 GPa and 100 MPa, respectively. Nanocomposites were manufactured by infusing the nanocellulose paper with an epoxy resin using vacuum assisted resin infusion. The cellulose reinforced epoxy nanocomposites were found to possess a stiffness and strength of approximately ∼8 GPa and ∼100 MPa at an equivalent fibre volume fraction of 60 vol.-%. In terms of the reinforcing ability of NFC and BC in a polymer matrix, no significant difference between NFC and BC was observed.

Topics
  • nanocomposite
  • surface
  • polymer
  • x-ray diffraction
  • Nitrogen
  • strength
  • cellulose
  • resin
  • crystallinity
  • degradation temperature