Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Mills, Benjamin

  • Google
  • 12
  • 31
  • 67

University of Southampton

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (12/12 displayed)

  • 2021Laser Induced Backwards Transfer (LIBT) of graphene onto glasscitations
  • 2020Microscale deposition of 2D materials via laser induced backwards transfercitations
  • 2020Automated 3D labelling of fibroblasts and endothelial cells in SEM-imaged placenta using deep learning6citations
  • 2019Automated 3D labelling of fibroblasts in SEM-imaged placenta using deep learningcitations
  • 2019Image-based monitoring of high-precision laser machining via a convolutional neural networkcitations
  • 2017Time-resolved imaging of flyer dynamics for femtosecond laser-induced backward transfer of solid polymer thin films28citations
  • 2017Laser fabricated nanofoam from polymeric substratescitations
  • 2015Dynamic spatial pulse shaping via a digital micromirror device for patterned laser-induced forward transfer of solid polymer films33citations
  • 2014Femtosecond multi-level phase switching in chalcogenide thin films for all-optical data and image processingcitations
  • 2013Printing of continuous copper lines using LIFT with donor replenishmentcitations
  • 2013Chalcogenide-based phase-change metamaterials for all-optical, high-contrast switching in a fraction of a wavelengthcitations
  • 2009Nanomaterial structure determination using XUV diffractioncitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Eason, Robert W.
9 / 65 shared
Praeger, Matthew
4 / 18 shared
Mcdonnell, Michael
2 / 2 shared
Blundell, Sophie
2 / 2 shared
Xie, Yunhui
3 / 3 shared
Etter, Olivia
2 / 2 shared
Grant-Jacob, James A.
7 / 19 shared
Mackay, Benita
3 / 4 shared
Lewis, Rohan
2 / 2 shared
Heath, Daniel
2 / 3 shared
Heath, D.
1 / 1 shared
Gregorčič, P.
1 / 1 shared
Feinäugle, M.
2 / 6 shared
Heath, Daniel J.
1 / 1 shared
Feinäugle, Matthias
1 / 1 shared
Wang, Q.
1 / 19 shared
Hewak, Daniel W.
2 / 80 shared
Craig, Christopher
1 / 37 shared
Rogers, E. T. F.
1 / 1 shared
Macdonald, Kevin
2 / 12 shared
Maddock, Jonathan
1 / 1 shared
Hoppenbrouwers, M. B.
1 / 2 shared
Oosterhuis, G.
1 / 2 shared
Sones, Collin
1 / 6 shared
Maddock, J.
1 / 1 shared
Butcher, Tom
1 / 1 shared
Chapman, Richard
1 / 2 shared
Rogers, Edward T. F.
1 / 2 shared
Brocklesby, William
1 / 5 shared
Stebbings, Sarah
1 / 1 shared
Frey, Jeremy G.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2021
2020
2019
2017
2015
2014
2013
2009

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Eason, Robert W.
  • Praeger, Matthew
  • Mcdonnell, Michael
  • Blundell, Sophie
  • Xie, Yunhui
  • Etter, Olivia
  • Grant-Jacob, James A.
  • Mackay, Benita
  • Lewis, Rohan
  • Heath, Daniel
  • Heath, D.
  • Gregorčič, P.
  • Feinäugle, M.
  • Heath, Daniel J.
  • Feinäugle, Matthias
  • Wang, Q.
  • Hewak, Daniel W.
  • Craig, Christopher
  • Rogers, E. T. F.
  • Macdonald, Kevin
  • Maddock, Jonathan
  • Hoppenbrouwers, M. B.
  • Oosterhuis, G.
  • Sones, Collin
  • Maddock, J.
  • Butcher, Tom
  • Chapman, Richard
  • Rogers, Edward T. F.
  • Brocklesby, William
  • Stebbings, Sarah
  • Frey, Jeremy G.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Laser Induced Backwards Transfer (LIBT) of graphene onto glass

  • Mills, Benjamin
  • Eason, Robert W.
  • Praeger, Matthew
Abstract

Graphene growth is typically optimized for uniformity over relatively large areas; however, this can place undesirable limitations on the design of graphene-based devices and can mandate the use of additional lithographic processing steps. Localized transfer of graphene can therefore offer significant benefits, permitting greater freedom in device design thereby enabling new applications. <br/>We present results obtained using a laser transfer method which is capable of localized deposition of graphene onto transparent receiver materials such as glass (using just a single fs laser pulse per deposited structure). In this method (laser induced backwards transfer, LIBT [1-3]) a pulsed laser beam is focussed through the receiving substrate and onto the donor substrate (hence the requirement for the receiver to be transparent). In this case the receiver is a microscope cover glass which is held in close contact with the donor during LIBT. The donor is a nickel coated glass slide upon which large-area monolayer graphene is transferred via the floating film technique with the aid of a PMMA support layer that is subsequently dissolved. The focused laser pulse is absorbed within the metal layer of the donor causing rapid, localized, thermal expansion (a shockwave). This ejects the graphene from the donor surface (only where the laser was focused) and transfers it to the receiver substrate. In this manner, microscale patterning of graphene on the receiver substrate is achieved.<br/>Additionally, we present details of spatial beam modulation via a digital micromirror device (DMD, [4, 5])which allows the shape and size of the deposited graphene to be precisely, computer controlled in the micron range. This innovation could help to facilitate rapid prototyping of graphene-based devices, allowing numerous design variations to be tested quickly and without requiring the purchase of multiple, costly, lithographic masks. This work extends on previous results obtained by the authors at a laser wavelength of 800nm [6] by using an optical parametric amplifier (OPA) to generate laser light at 1650nm and additionally introduces control over laser pulse duration, allowing switching between 200fs and 1200fs pulses.<br/>The presence of graphene on a surface creates a slight change in optical reflectance and so it is often possible (although difficult) to observe the presence of localized deposits of graphene via optical microscopy. We have developed image processing methods (with contrast enhancement and image segmentation steps) that greatly simplify the identification of graphene coated regions. These methods have been evaluated using Raman microscopy and have proved to be an accurate and convenient tool (see Figure 1) which we believe may be of interest to other researchers in this field.

Topics
  • Deposition
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • nickel
  • glass
  • glass
  • thermal expansion
  • optical microscopy
  • Raman microscopy