People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Ehrmann, Andrea
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (18/18 displayed)
- 2024Investigation the Optical Contrast Between Nanofiber Mats and Mammalian Cells Dyed with Fluorescent and Other Dyes
- 2024Algae-Based Biopolymers for Batteries and Biofuel Applications in Comparison with Bacterial Biopolymers—A Reviewcitations
- 2024Influence of Textile Substrates on the Adhesion of PJM-Printed MED610 and Surface Morphology ; Vpliv tekstilnega substrata na adhezijo smole MED610, natisnjene s tehniko kapljičnega nanašanja PJM, in morfologija površinecitations
- 2024Comparison of FDM and SLA printing on woven fabricscitations
- 2023Exchange Bias in Nanostructures: An Updatecitations
- 2023Nanofibers are a matter of perspective: effects of methodology and subjectivity on diameter measurementscitations
- 2023Examination of Polymer Blends by AFM Phase Imagescitations
- 2022Extraction of keratin from wool and its use as biopolymer in film formation and in electrospinning for composite material processingcitations
- 2022Electrospinning Nanofiber Mats with Magnetite Nanoparticles Using Various Needle-Based Techniquescitations
- 2022Investigation of Low-Cost FDM-Printed Polymers for Elevated-Temperature Applicationscitations
- 2021Adhesion of Electrospun Poly(acrylonitrile) Nanofibers on Conductive and Isolating Foil Substratescitations
- 2021Pressure Orientation-Dependent Recovery of 3D-Printed PLA Objects with Varying Infill Degreecitations
- 2021Coatings / Adhesion of Electrospun Poly(acrylonitrile) Nanofibers on Conductive and Isolating Foil Substratescitations
- 2019Improved abrasion resistance of textile fabrics due to polymer coatingscitations
- 2019Stabilization of Electrospun Nanofiber Mats Used for Filters by 3D Printingcitations
- 2019Increased Mechanical Properties of Carbon Nanofiber Mats for Possible Medical Applications
- 2019Electrospun Nanofiber Mats with Embedded Non-Sintered TiO2 for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (DSSCs)citations
- 2017Influence of Solution and Spinning Parameters on Nanofiber Mat Creation of Poly(ethylene oxide) by Needleless Electrospinning
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Electrospinning Nanofiber Mats with Magnetite Nanoparticles Using Various Needle-Based Techniques
Abstract
<jats:p>Electrospinning can be used to produce nanofiber mats containing diverse nanoparticles for various purposes. Magnetic nanoparticles, such as magnetite (Fe3O4), can be introduced to produce magnetic nanofiber mats, e.g., for hyperthermia applications, but also for basic research of diluted magnetic systems. As the number of nanoparticles increases, however, the morphology and the mechanical properties of the nanofiber mats decrease, so that freestanding composite nanofiber mats with a high content of nanoparticles are hard to produce. Here we report on poly (acrylonitrile) (PAN) composite nanofiber mats, electrospun by a needle-based system, containing 50 wt% magnetite nanoparticles overall or in the shell of core–shell fibers, collected on a flat or a rotating collector. While the first nanofiber mats show an irregular morphology, the latter are quite regular and contain straight fibers without many beads or agglomerations. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) reveal agglomerations around the pure composite nanofibers and even, round core–shell fibers, the latter showing slightly increased fiber diameters. Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) shows a regular distribution of the embedded magnetic nanoparticles. Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) reveals that mechanical properties are reduced as compared to nanofiber mats with smaller amounts of magnetic nanoparticles, but mats with 50 wt% magnetite are still freestanding.</jats:p>