| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Palola, Sarianna
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (20/20 displayed)
- 2024Durability and Functionality of Conventional Polymeric Packaging Materials in Reusable Packaging Systems
- 2022Fiber Resizing, Compounding and Validationcitations
- 2022Examining interfacial interactions in a range of polymers using poly(ethylene oxide) functionalized carbon fiberscitations
- 2022Towards Sustainable Composite Manufacturing with Recycled Carbon Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Compositescitations
- 2022Mixed Surface Chemistry on Carbon Fibers to Promote Adhesion in Epoxy and PMMA Polymerscitations
- 2022Comparison of interlaminar and interfacial shear strength with recycled carbon fiber
- 2021Adiabatic heating and damage onset in a pultruded glass fiber reinforced composite under compressive loading at different strain rates.citations
- 2021Adiabatic heating and damage onset in a pultruded glass fiber reinforced composite under compressive loading at different strain rates.citations
- 2021One surface treatment, multiple possibilities : Broadening the use‐potential of para‐aramid fibers with mechanical adhesioncitations
- 2021One surface treatment, multiple possibilitiescitations
- 2021One Surface Treatment, Multiple Possibilities: Broadening the Use-Potential of Para-Aramid Fibers with Mechanical Adhesioncitations
- 2020Development in Additive Methods in Aramid Fiber Surface Modification to Increase Fiber-Matrix Adhesion: A Reviewcitations
- 2020Examining interfacial interactions in a range of polymers using poly(ethylene oxide) functionalized carbon fiberscitations
- 2020Development in additive methods in aramid fiber surface modification to increase fiber-matrix adhesioncitations
- 2020Resizing approach to increase the viability of recycled fibre-reinforced compositescitations
- 2020Resizing Approach to Increase the Viability of Recycled Fibre-Reinforced Compositescitations
- 2019Properties of pyrolytically recycled carbon fibers and their re-use in composites
- 2019DLC-treated aramid-fibre composites: Tailoring nanoscale-coating for macroscale performancecitations
- 2019Perspectives on the industrial implementation of novel microwave assisted surface modification method for aramid fibers
- 2017Microwave induced hierarchical nanostructures on aramid fibers and their influence on adhesion properties in a rubber matrixcitations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
One surface treatment, multiple possibilities
Abstract
<p>Aramid fibers are high‐strength and high‐modulus technical fibers used in protective clothing, such as bulletproof vests and helmets, as well as in industrial applications, such as tires and brake pads. However, their full potential is not currently utilized due to adhesion problems to matrix materials. In this paper, we study how the introduction of mechanical adhesion between aramid fibers and matrix material the affects adhesion properties of the fiber in both thermoplastic and thermoset matrix. A microwave‐induced surface modification method is used to create nanostructures to the fiber surface and a high throughput microbond method is used to determine changes in interfacial shear strength with an epoxy (EP) and a polypropylene (PP) matrix. Additionally, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy were used to evaluate the surface morphology of the fibers and differences in failure mechanism at the fiber‐matrix interface. We were able to increase interfacial shear strength (IFSS) by 82 and 358%, in EP and PP matrix, respectively, due to increased surface roughness and mechanical adhesion. Also, aging studies were conducted to confirm that no changes in the adhesion properties would occur over time.</p>