Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Poulis, Hans

  • Google
  • 9
  • 16
  • 170

Delft University of Technology

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (9/9 displayed)

  • 2022The influence of the surface roughness, creep and relaxation on the performance of elastomeric liners for sustainable glass bottle closures1citations
  • 2021The influence of grit blasting and UV/Ozone treatments on Ti-Ti adhesive bonds and their durability after sol-gel and primer application9citations
  • 2021The photostability and peel strength of ethylene butyl acrylate copolymer blends for use in conservation of cultural heritage3citations
  • 2020Influence of moisture and CO2 on the material behavior of thermoplastic elastomers for beer bottle closures2citations
  • 2020Enhanced Interface Adhesion by Novel Eco-Epoxy Adhesives Based on the Modified Tannic Acid on Al and CFRP Adherends15citations
  • 2020The Influence of Loading, Temperature and Relative Humidity on Adhesives for Canvas Lining6citations
  • 2020Improving the adhesion strength of polymers: effect of surface treatments48citations
  • 2017Laboratory strength testing of pine wood and birch bark adhesives: a first study of the material properties of pitch33citations
  • 2016Lap Shear and Impact Testing of Ochre and Beeswax in Experimental Middle Stone Age Compound Adhesives53citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Turan, Deniz
2 / 2 shared
Boshuizen, Bart
1 / 2 shared
Rans, Calvin
1 / 4 shared
Rodríguez, Laura Angélica Ardila
1 / 3 shared
Beerkens, L. G. M.
1 / 1 shared
Rie, E. René De La
1 / 2 shared
Mosleh, Yasmine
2 / 33 shared
Teixeira De Freitas, Sofia
1 / 33 shared
Vuksanović, Marija
1 / 7 shared
Živković, Andreja
1 / 2 shared
Tomić, Nataša Z.
1 / 20 shared
Marinković, Aleksandar
1 / 32 shared
Seymour, Kate
1 / 3 shared
Hamdi, Marouen
1 / 1 shared
Kozowyk, Paul
2 / 2 shared
Langejans, Geeske
2 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2021
2020
2017
2016

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Turan, Deniz
  • Boshuizen, Bart
  • Rans, Calvin
  • Rodríguez, Laura Angélica Ardila
  • Beerkens, L. G. M.
  • Rie, E. René De La
  • Mosleh, Yasmine
  • Teixeira De Freitas, Sofia
  • Vuksanović, Marija
  • Živković, Andreja
  • Tomić, Nataša Z.
  • Marinković, Aleksandar
  • Seymour, Kate
  • Hamdi, Marouen
  • Kozowyk, Paul
  • Langejans, Geeske
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Enhanced Interface Adhesion by Novel Eco-Epoxy Adhesives Based on the Modified Tannic Acid on Al and CFRP Adherends

  • Poulis, Hans
  • Teixeira De Freitas, Sofia
  • Vuksanović, Marija
  • Živković, Andreja
  • Tomić, Nataša Z.
  • Marinković, Aleksandar
Abstract

<p>This paper presents a new process for obtaining eco-epoxide adhesives synthesized from bio-renewable raw material (tannic acid-TA) and used for bonding lightweight materials (aluminum (Al) and carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP). Two synthesized bio-epoxy components based on TA, (A) glycidyl ether and (B) glycidyl phosphate ester of TA, were used as a replacement for the toxic epoxy component based on Bisphenol A. The effect of eco-epoxy components on the interface adhesion was measured by the determination of adhesion parameter b, which was compared to the reference epoxy (REF). The increase of adhesion parameter b was 77.5% for A and 151.5% for B. The adhesion of both eco-adhesives was tested using the bell peel test (BPT) with the Al and CFRP adherends. When compared to REF, the average peel load for B was 17.6% (39.3%) and 58.3% (176.9%) higher for the Al and CFRP adherends, respectively. Complete adhesion failure of REF reflected the weak adhesion to both Al and CFRP, which was improved by the addition of eco-epoxy components A and B showing the presence of cohesive failure. The microhardness testing method of interface adhesion was proven to be a fast and reliable testing method, providing a qualitative indication in adhesive selection.</p>

Topics
  • polymer
  • Carbon
  • aluminium
  • ester