| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Mikulewicz, Marcin
Wroclaw Medical University
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (10/10 displayed)
- 2023Influence of Storing Composite Filling Materials in a Low-pH Artificial Saliva on Their Mechanical Properties—An In Vitro Studycitations
- 2023Correlation between friction and wear in cylindrical anchorages simulated with wear machine and analyzed with scanning probe and electron microscope
- 2023Comparative analysis of fused deposition modeling and digital light processing techniques for dimensional accuracy in clear aligner manufacturingcitations
- 2023Influence of storing composite filling materials in a low-pH artificial saliva on their mechanical properties— an in vitro studycitations
- 2023Comparison of the tensile modulus of three 3D-printable materials used in dentistry
- 2023Mechanical properties and biocompatibility of 3D printing acrylic material with bioactive componentscitations
- 2023The influence of polishing and artificial aging on BioMed Amber® resin’s mechanical propertiescitations
- 2023Multifunctional cellulose-based biomaterials for dental applications: a sustainable approach to oral health and regenerationcitations
- 2022Comparison of the compression and tensile modulus of two chosen resins used in dentistry for 3D printingcitations
- 2018Comparative assessment of the corrosion process of orthodontic archwires made of stainless steel, titanium–molybdenum and nickel–titanium alloyscitations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Comparison of the compression and tensile modulus of two chosen resins used in dentistry for 3D printing
Abstract
(1) The CAD/CAM technique exploiting 3D printing is becoming more and more popular in dentistry. The resins are used in all the dental specialties, including conservative dentistry, prosthodontics, surgery, and orthodontics. The interest in investigating the different properties of dental materials has been an aim of researchers. The purpose of the presented study was to compare the properties of two 3D-printable dental resins (both rigid, used for medical purposes). (2) Methods: Ten blocks of two-type shapes were printed on a printer designed for medical use. The tensile modulus and compression were investigated and compared. The axial compression test was performed according to the PN-EN ISO 604:2003 norm, while the tensile test was performed according to the PN-En ISO 527-1-2019 (E) norm. In the first test, the sample size of the perpendicular shape was 10 ± 0.2 mm × 10 ± 0.2 mm × 4 ± 0.2 mm and in the second it was 75 mm, the end width 10 mm, and the thickness 2 mm. (3) Results: The statistical analysis based on ANOVA tests showed that all the obtained results were statistically significant. Both of the examined materials had similar properties and were resistant and stable in shape. The tensile modulus and compression tests performed on them gave similar results. They also showed high durability to compression and tensility. (4) Conclusions: Both of the examined materials were durable and rigid materials. BioMed Amber was more resistant to compression, while Dental LT clear was more resistant in the tensility test. Although both resins had similar physical properties, it is still disputable whether the chosen materials could be used interchangeably.