Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Käding, Max

  • Google
  • 6
  • 10
  • 36

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (6/6 displayed)

  • 2024Acoustic Emission Monitoring in Prestressed Concrete3citations
  • 2024Analysis of the Repeatability of the Pencil Lead Break in Comparison to the Ball Impact and Electromagnetic Body-Noise Actuatorcitations
  • 2023Wire Break Detection in Bridge Tendons Using Low-Frequency Acoustic Emissions4citations
  • 2023Frequency dependent amplitude response of different couplant materials for mounting piezoelectric sensors3citations
  • 2023Semi-supervised Learning for Acoustic Vision Monitoring of Tendons in Pre-stressed Concrete Bridges1citations
  • 2022Acoustic Emission analysis of a comprehensive database of wire breaks in prestressed concrete girders25citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Marx, Steffen
6 / 34 shared
Ostermann, Jörn
4 / 4 shared
Gutiérrez, Raúl Enrique Beltrán
2 / 2 shared
Jiang, Nan
1 / 4 shared
Krause, Thomas
1 / 1 shared
Lange, Alexander
4 / 7 shared
Hinrichs, Reemt
2 / 2 shared
Schmidt, Boso
1 / 2 shared
Xu, Ronghua
2 / 3 shared
Schacht, Gregor
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Marx, Steffen
  • Ostermann, Jörn
  • Gutiérrez, Raúl Enrique Beltrán
  • Jiang, Nan
  • Krause, Thomas
  • Lange, Alexander
  • Hinrichs, Reemt
  • Schmidt, Boso
  • Xu, Ronghua
  • Schacht, Gregor
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Acoustic Emission Monitoring in Prestressed Concrete

  • Marx, Steffen
  • Käding, Max
Abstract

<p>Acoustic emission monitoring (AEM) has emerged as an effective technique for detecting wire breaks resulting from, e.g., stress corrosion cracking, and its application on prestressed concrete bridges is increasing. The success of this monitoring measure depends crucially on a carefully designed sensor layout. For this, the attenuation of elastic waves within the structure’s material is ideally determined in situ through object-related measurements (ORMs) with a reproducible signal source, typically a rebound hammer. This assumes that the attenuation coefficients derived from rebound hammer tests are comparable to those from wire breaks, thus allowing their results to be directly applied to wire break detection without further adjustments. This study challenges this assumption by analysing attenuation behaviour through an extensive dataset. Employing time-domain and frequency analysis, the research generates attenuation profiles from laboratory experiments and in situ measurements across various girders and bridge structures, extracting the slope and residual standard deviation (RSD). While generally validating this approach, the findings highlight differences in attenuation behaviour from among wire break signals and rebound hammer impulses, whereby the latter potentially underestimates the relevant attenuation of wire breaks by approximately 20%. Consequently, a transfer factor is proposed to adjust ORM results obtained with the rebound hammer for wire break scenarios. It consists of a scaling factor of 1.2 to modify the average attenuation coefficient and a constant term of ±1.0 dB/m to cover a 95% confidence interval, and thus, account for sample scattering. Moreover, the anisotropic attenuation behaviour across different structures was studied, showing that transverse attenuation consistently exceeds the longitudinal, significantly influenced by structural features such as voids. In prefabricated concrete bridges with in situ-cast concrete slabs, transverse signal transmission remains unhindered across multiple elements. Finally, the results provide a valuable reference for the design of sensor layouts in bridge monitoring, particularly benefiting scenarios where direct in situ experiences are lacking.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • experiment
  • anisotropic
  • acoustic emission
  • void
  • analytical electron microscopy
  • wire
  • stress corrosion