Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Johnson, Bradley R.

  • Google
  • 18
  • 62
  • 55

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (18/18 displayed)

  • 2019Solid Secondary Waste Immobilization in Cementitious Waste Forms at the Hanford Site - 19081citations
  • 2014Preliminary Phase Field Computational Model Developmentcitations
  • 2013Sublimation-Condensation of Multiscale Tellurium Structures5citations
  • 2009Electromagnetic material changes for remote detection and monitoring: a feasibility study: Progress reportcitations
  • 2009DC Ionization Conductivity of Amorphous Semiconductors for Radiation Detection Applications3citations
  • 2008ASGRAD FY07 Annual Reportcitations
  • 2008FY 2008 Infrared Photonics Final Reportcitations
  • 2007Engineered SMR catalysts based on hydrothermally stable, porous, ceramic supports for microchannel reactors42citations
  • 2007FY06 Annual Report: Amorphous Semiconductors for Gamma Radiation Detection (ASGRAD)citations
  • 2007Differential etching of chalcogenides for infrared photonic waveguide structures5citations
  • 2006Summary of Chalcogenide Glass Processing: Wet-Etching and Photolithographycitations
  • 2006Pressure-temperature dependence of nanowire formation in the arsenic-sulfur systemcitations
  • 2005Microstructural and Microchemical Characterization of Primary-Side Cracks in an Alloy 600 Nozzle Head Penetration and its Alloy 182 J-Weld from the Davis-Besse Reactor Vesselcitations
  • 2005FY 2005 Miniature Spherical Retroreflectors Final Reportcitations
  • 2005FY 2005 Infrared Photonics Final Reportcitations
  • 2004Laser Writing in Arsenic Trisulfide Glasscitations
  • 2004FY 2004 Infrared Photonics Final Reportcitations
  • 2004Chalcogenide glasses and structures for quantum sensingcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Saslow, Sarah A.
1 / 2 shared
Smith, Gary L.
1 / 2 shared
Asmussen, R. Matthew
1 / 1 shared
Neeway, James J.
1 / 4 shared
Varga, Tamas
1 / 9 shared
Brown, Elvie
1 / 1 shared
Swanberg, David J.
1 / 2 shared
Westsik, Jr., Joseph H.
1 / 1 shared
Xu, Ke
1 / 15 shared
Ramuhalli, Pradeep
1 / 1 shared
Suter, Jonathan D.
1 / 1 shared
Mccloy, John S.
3 / 8 shared
Li, Yulan
1 / 3 shared
Hu, Shenyang Y.
1 / 2 shared
Schaef, Herbert T.
1 / 1 shared
Sundaram, S. K.
11 / 11 shared
Riley, Brian J.
10 / 14 shared
Mcmakin, Douglas L.
1 / 1 shared
Jordan, David V.
1 / 1 shared
Kelly, James F.
1 / 1 shared
Campbell, Luke W.
1 / 1 shared
Ryan, Joseph V.
1 / 3 shared
Crum, Jarrod V.
3 / 3 shared
Seifert, Carolyn E.
2 / 2 shared
Van Ginhoven, Renee M.
2 / 2 shared
Henager, Charles H.
2 / 3 shared
Rockett, Angus
1 / 4 shared
Aquino, Angel
1 / 1 shared
Krishnaswami, Kannan
2 / 2 shared
Carlie, Nathan A.
1 / 1 shared
Gervais, Kevin L.
1 / 1 shared
Hatchell, Brian K.
1 / 1 shared
Bernacki, Bruce E.
2 / 2 shared
Phillips, Mark C.
1 / 1 shared
Anheier, Norman C.
6 / 6 shared
Qiao, Hong
3 / 3 shared
Dagle, Robert A.
1 / 1 shared
Wang, Yong
1 / 21 shared
Tran, Diana N.
1 / 1 shared
Holladay, Jamie D.
1 / 1 shared
Li, Xiaohong S.
1 / 1 shared
Canfield, Nathan L.
1 / 2 shared
Zhang, Yanwen
1 / 22 shared
Shutthanandan, V.
1 / 2 shared
Saraf, Laxmikant V.
3 / 3 shared
Olmstead, Juliana D.
1 / 1 shared
Engelhard, Mark H.
1 / 4 shared
Williford, Rick E.
1 / 1 shared
Vetrano, John S.
1 / 1 shared
Bruemmer, Stephen M.
1 / 2 shared
Thomas, L.
1 / 9 shared
Sliger, William A.
1 / 1 shared
Riley, Bradley M.
1 / 1 shared
Martinez, James E.
3 / 3 shared
Ho, Nicolas
1 / 1 shared
Schultz, John F.
3 / 3 shared
Allen, Paul J.
3 / 3 shared
Keller, Paul E.
1 / 1 shared
Bennett, Wendy D.
1 / 1 shared
Martin, Peter M.
1 / 1 shared
Manijeh Razeghi, Gail J. Brown
1 / 1 shared
Schweiger, Michael J.
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2019
2014
2013
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Saslow, Sarah A.
  • Smith, Gary L.
  • Asmussen, R. Matthew
  • Neeway, James J.
  • Varga, Tamas
  • Brown, Elvie
  • Swanberg, David J.
  • Westsik, Jr., Joseph H.
  • Xu, Ke
  • Ramuhalli, Pradeep
  • Suter, Jonathan D.
  • Mccloy, John S.
  • Li, Yulan
  • Hu, Shenyang Y.
  • Schaef, Herbert T.
  • Sundaram, S. K.
  • Riley, Brian J.
  • Mcmakin, Douglas L.
  • Jordan, David V.
  • Kelly, James F.
  • Campbell, Luke W.
  • Ryan, Joseph V.
  • Crum, Jarrod V.
  • Seifert, Carolyn E.
  • Van Ginhoven, Renee M.
  • Henager, Charles H.
  • Rockett, Angus
  • Aquino, Angel
  • Krishnaswami, Kannan
  • Carlie, Nathan A.
  • Gervais, Kevin L.
  • Hatchell, Brian K.
  • Bernacki, Bruce E.
  • Phillips, Mark C.
  • Anheier, Norman C.
  • Qiao, Hong
  • Dagle, Robert A.
  • Wang, Yong
  • Tran, Diana N.
  • Holladay, Jamie D.
  • Li, Xiaohong S.
  • Canfield, Nathan L.
  • Zhang, Yanwen
  • Shutthanandan, V.
  • Saraf, Laxmikant V.
  • Olmstead, Juliana D.
  • Engelhard, Mark H.
  • Williford, Rick E.
  • Vetrano, John S.
  • Bruemmer, Stephen M.
  • Thomas, L.
  • Sliger, William A.
  • Riley, Bradley M.
  • Martinez, James E.
  • Ho, Nicolas
  • Schultz, John F.
  • Allen, Paul J.
  • Keller, Paul E.
  • Bennett, Wendy D.
  • Martin, Peter M.
  • Manijeh Razeghi, Gail J. Brown
  • Schweiger, Michael J.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

report

Preliminary Phase Field Computational Model Development

  • Xu, Ke
  • Ramuhalli, Pradeep
  • Suter, Jonathan D.
  • Mccloy, John S.
  • Li, Yulan
  • Hu, Shenyang Y.
  • Johnson, Bradley R.
Abstract

This interim report presents progress towards the development of meso-scale models of magnetic behavior that incorporate microstructural information. Modeling magnetic signatures in irradiated materials with complex microstructures (such as structural steels) is a significant challenge. The complexity is addressed incrementally, using the monocrystalline Fe (i.e., ferrite) film as model systems to develop and validate initial models, followed by polycrystalline Fe films, and by more complicated and representative alloys. In addition, the modeling incrementally addresses inclusion of other major phases (e.g., martensite, austenite), minor magnetic phases (e.g., carbides, FeCr precipitates), and minor nonmagnetic phases (e.g., Cu precipitates, voids). The focus of the magnetic modeling is on phase-field models. The models are based on the numerical solution to the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation. From the computational standpoint, phase-field modeling allows the simulation of large enough systems that relevant defect structures and their effects on functional properties like magnetism can be simulated. To date, two phase-field models have been generated in support of this work. First, a bulk iron model with periodic boundary conditions was generated as a proof-of-concept to investigate major loop effects of single versus polycrystalline bulk iron and effects of single non-magnetic defects. More recently, to support the experimental program herein using iron thin films, a new model was generated that uses finite boundary conditions representing surfaces and edges. This model has provided key insights into the domain structures observed in magnetic force microscopy (MFM) measurements. Simulation results for single crystal thin-film iron indicate the feasibility of the model for determining magnetic domain wall thickness and mobility in an externally applied field. Because the phase-field model dimensions are limited relative to the size of most specimens used in experiments, special experimental methods were devised to create similar boundary conditions in the iron films. Preliminary MFM studies conducted on single and polycrystalline iron films with small sub-areas created with focused ion beam have correlated quite well qualitatively with phase-field simulations. However, phase-field model dimensions are still small relative to experiments thus far. We are in the process of increasing the size of the models and decreasing specimen size so both have identical dimensions. Ongoing research is focused on validation of the phase-field model. Validation is being accomplished through comparison with experimentally obtained MFM images (in progress), and planned measurements of major hysteresis loops and first order reversal curves. Extrapolation of simulation sizes to represent a more stochastic bulk-like system will require sampling of various simulations (i.e., with single non-magnetic defect, single magnetic defect, single grain boundary, single dislocation, etc.) with distributions of input parameters. These outputs can then be compared to laboratory magnetic measurements and ultimately to simulate magnetic Barkhausen noise signals.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • single crystal
  • grain
  • inclusion
  • phase
  • mobility
  • grain boundary
  • experiment
  • thin film
  • simulation
  • carbide
  • focused ion beam
  • dislocation
  • precipitate
  • iron
  • void
  • magnetic domain wall
  • defect structure
  • structural steel
  • magnetic force microscope