Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Brooker, Richard A.

  • Google
  • 7
  • 25
  • 179

University of Bristol

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (7/7 displayed)

  • 2022The glass transition and the non-Arrhenian viscosity of carbonate melts9citations
  • 2022The glass transition and the non-Arrhenian viscosity of carbonate melts9citations
  • 2020The microanalysis of iron and sulphur oxidation states in silicate glass - Understanding the effects of beam damage8citations
  • 2018High spatial resolution analysis of the iron oxidation state in silicate glasses using the electron probe29citations
  • 2018High spatial resolution analysis of the iron oxidation state in silicate glasses using the electron probe29citations
  • 2016Textural and chemical consequences of interaction between hydrous mafic and felsic magmas37citations
  • 2013Quantification of dissolved CO2 in silicate glasses using micro-Raman spectroscopy58citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Di Genova, Danilo
4 / 9 shared
Weidendorfer, Daniel
2 / 3 shared
Hess, Kai-Uwe
2 / 10 shared
Dingwell, D. B.
1 / 6 shared
Wilson, Mark
2 / 16 shared
Drewitt, James W. E.
2 / 12 shared
Wilding, Martin C.
2 / 3 shared
Genova, Danilo Di
2 / 4 shared
Dingwell, Donald B.
1 / 14 shared
Blundy, Jon D.
4 / 5 shared
Kearns, Stuart L.
3 / 3 shared
Buse, Benjamin
1 / 3 shared
Kilgour, Geoff
3 / 5 shared
Hughes, Ery C.
3 / 3 shared
Mader, Heidy M.
3 / 6 shared
Almeev, Renat R.
2 / 3 shared
Balzer, Robert
2 / 5 shared
Buse, Ben
2 / 2 shared
Botcharnikov, Roman E.
2 / 4 shared
Riker, Jenny M.
2 / 2 shared
Eimf
1 / 1 shared
Pistone, Mattia
1 / 4 shared
Kjarsgaard, Bruce A.
1 / 1 shared
Morizet, Yann
1 / 14 shared
Iacono-Marziano, Giada
1 / 8 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2020
2018
2016
2013

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Di Genova, Danilo
  • Weidendorfer, Daniel
  • Hess, Kai-Uwe
  • Dingwell, D. B.
  • Wilson, Mark
  • Drewitt, James W. E.
  • Wilding, Martin C.
  • Genova, Danilo Di
  • Dingwell, Donald B.
  • Blundy, Jon D.
  • Kearns, Stuart L.
  • Buse, Benjamin
  • Kilgour, Geoff
  • Hughes, Ery C.
  • Mader, Heidy M.
  • Almeev, Renat R.
  • Balzer, Robert
  • Buse, Ben
  • Botcharnikov, Roman E.
  • Riker, Jenny M.
  • Eimf
  • Pistone, Mattia
  • Kjarsgaard, Bruce A.
  • Morizet, Yann
  • Iacono-Marziano, Giada
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

High spatial resolution analysis of the iron oxidation state in silicate glasses using the electron probe

  • Di Genova, Danilo
  • Blundy, Jon D.
  • Almeev, Renat R.
  • Kearns, Stuart L.
  • Balzer, Robert
  • Brooker, Richard A.
  • Kilgour, Geoff
  • Buse, Ben
  • Botcharnikov, Roman E.
  • Riker, Jenny M.
  • Hughes, Ery C.
  • Mader, Heidy M.
Abstract

The iron oxidation state in silicate melts is important for understanding their physical properties, although it is most often used to estimate the oxygen fugacity of magmatic systems. Often high spatial resolution analyses are required, yet the available techniques, such as μXANES and μMössbauer, require synchrotron access. The flank method is an electron probe technique with the potential to measure Fe oxidation state at high spatial resolution but requires careful method development to reduce errors related to sample damage, especially for hydrous glasses. The intensity ratios derived from measurements on the flanks of FeLα and FeLβ X-rays (FeLβf/FeLαf) over a time interval (time-dependent ratio flank method) can be extrapolated to their initial values at the onset of analysis. We have developed and calibrated this new method using silicate glasses with a wide range of compositions (43–78 wt% SiO2, 0–10 wt% H2O, and 2–18 wt% FeOT, which is all Fe reported as FeO), including 68 glasses with known Fe oxidation state. The Fe oxidation state (Fe2+/FeT) of hydrous (0–4 wt% H2O) basaltic (43–56 wt% SiO2) and peralkaline (70–76 wt% SiO2) glasses with FeOT > 5 wt% can be quantified with a precision of ±0.03 (10 wt% FeOT and 0.5 Fe2+/FeT) and accuracy of ±0.1. We find basaltic and peralkaline glasses each require a different calibration curve and analysis at different spatial resolutions (∼20 and ∼60 μm diameter regions, respectively). A further 49 synthetic glasses were used to investigate the compositional controls on redox changes during electron beam irradiation, where we found that the direction of redox change is sensitive to glass composition. Anhydrous alkali-poor glasses become reduced during analysis, while hydrous and/or alkali-rich glasses become oxidized by the formation of magnetite nanolites identified using Raman spectroscopy. The rate of reduction is controlled by the initial oxidation state, whereas the rate of oxidation is controlled by SiO2, Fe, and H2O content.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • Oxygen
  • melt
  • glass
  • glass
  • iron
  • Raman spectroscopy
  • field-effect transistor method
  • electron probe micro analysis