Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Kumar, Naween

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 1

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023Efficient Hotel Review Rating Prediction using Ensemble Learning1citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Kumar, Chhotelal
1 / 1 shared
Kumar, Mukesh
1 / 11 shared
Kavitha, S.
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Kumar, Chhotelal
  • Kumar, Mukesh
  • Kavitha, S.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Efficient Hotel Review Rating Prediction using Ensemble Learning

  • Kumar, Chhotelal
  • Kumar, Mukesh
  • Kumar, Naween
  • Kavitha, S.
Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Machine Learning (ML) is a branch of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in which data-driven schemes learn patterns by being exposed to relevant data. Natural Language Processing (NLP) has been benefiting greatly from ML. In this article, ML is used to anticipate hotel review ratings. This paper proposes an Ensemble Learning-based rating prediction model for predicting ratings based on user reviews. The main objective of this research article is to accurately predict the best user experience rating. The majority voting technique of Ensemble learning has been used to predict the ratings. In this research article, first, the dataset is cleaned and then processed through a series of Natural Language Processing (NLP) preprocessing steps. This article includes a comparison of various classifiers with various embedders. Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) Classifier, Logistic Regression (LR), Logistic Regression Cross Validation (LRCV), Support Vector Classifier (SVC), Decision Tree Classifier (DTC), Random Forest Classifier (RFC), and K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN) are the 7 classifiers used, along with 3 embedding techniques: Bag of Words (BoW), Word2Vec, and Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF). Our proposed solution is more accurate and works well. Accuracy and count are used as performance measures to compare and validate classifiers and embedders. According to the simulation report, TF-IDF utilizing LRCV has a 61% accuracy rate.</jats:p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • simulation
  • random
  • machine learning