Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Schaafsma, Joanna

  • Google
  • 1
  • 17
  • 122

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2019Mechanical Thrombectomy in Ischemic Stroke Patients With Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score 0–5122citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Mordasini, Pasquale
1 / 1 shared
Michel, Patrik
1 / 1 shared
Chaloulos-Iakovidis, Panagiotis
1 / 1 shared
Fischer, Urs
1 / 5 shared
Hajdu, Steven D.
1 / 1 shared
Panos, Leonidas
1 / 1 shared
Gralla, Jan
1 / 2 shared
Friedrich, Benjamin
1 / 1 shared
Requena, Manuel
1 / 1 shared
Maegerlein, Christian
1 / 1 shared
Ribo, Marc
1 / 1 shared
Pierot, Laurent
1 / 1 shared
Gawlitza, Matthias
1 / 1 shared
Kaesmacher, Johannes
1 / 2 shared
Pereira, Vitor Mendes
1 / 1 shared
Costalat, Vincent
1 / 1 shared
Benali, Amel
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2019

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Mordasini, Pasquale
  • Michel, Patrik
  • Chaloulos-Iakovidis, Panagiotis
  • Fischer, Urs
  • Hajdu, Steven D.
  • Panos, Leonidas
  • Gralla, Jan
  • Friedrich, Benjamin
  • Requena, Manuel
  • Maegerlein, Christian
  • Ribo, Marc
  • Pierot, Laurent
  • Gawlitza, Matthias
  • Kaesmacher, Johannes
  • Pereira, Vitor Mendes
  • Costalat, Vincent
  • Benali, Amel
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Mechanical Thrombectomy in Ischemic Stroke Patients With Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score 0–5

  • Mordasini, Pasquale
  • Michel, Patrik
  • Chaloulos-Iakovidis, Panagiotis
  • Fischer, Urs
  • Hajdu, Steven D.
  • Panos, Leonidas
  • Gralla, Jan
  • Friedrich, Benjamin
  • Requena, Manuel
  • Maegerlein, Christian
  • Ribo, Marc
  • Pierot, Laurent
  • Gawlitza, Matthias
  • Kaesmacher, Johannes
  • Schaafsma, Joanna
  • Pereira, Vitor Mendes
  • Costalat, Vincent
  • Benali, Amel
Abstract

<jats:sec><jats:title>Background and Purpose—</jats:title><jats:p>If anterior circulation large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke patients presenting with ASPECTS 0–5 (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score) should be treated with mechanical thrombectomy remains unclear. Purpose of this study was to report on the outcome of patients with ASPECTS 0–5 treated with mechanical thrombectomy and to provide data regarding the effect of successful reperfusion on clinical outcomes and safety measures in these patients.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods—</jats:title><jats:p>Multicenter, pooled analysis of 7 institutional prospective registries: Bernese-European Registry for Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated Outside Current Guidelines With Neurothrombectomy Devices Using the SOLITAIRE FR With the Intention for Thrombectomy (Clinical Trial Registration—URL:<jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.clinicaltrials.gov">https://www.clinicaltrials.gov</jats:ext-link>. Unique identifier: NCT03496064). Primary outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale 0–3 at day 90 (favorable outcome). Secondary outcomes included rates of day 90 modified Rankin Scale 0–2 (functional independence), day 90 mortality and occurrence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association of successful reperfusion with clinical outcomes. Outputs are displayed as adjusted Odds Ratios (aOR) and 95% CI.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results—</jats:title><jats:p>Two hundred thirty-seven of 2046 patients included in this registry presented with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion and ASPECTS 0–5. In this subgroup, the overall rates of favorable outcome and mortality at day 90 were 40.1% and 40.9%. Achieving successful reperfusion was independently associated with favorable outcome (aOR, 5.534; 95% CI, 2.363–12.961), functional independence (aOR, 5.583; 95% CI, 1.964–15.873), reduced mortality (aOR, 0.180; 95% CI, 0.083–0.390), and lower rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (aOR, 0.235; 95% CI, 0.062–0.887). The mortality-reducing effect remained in patients with ASPECTS 0–4 (aOR, 0.167; 95% CI, 0.056–0.499). Sensitivity analyses did not change the primary results.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions—</jats:title><jats:p>In patients presenting with ASPECTS 0–5, who were treated with mechanical thrombectomy, successful reperfusion was beneficial without increasing the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Although the results do not allow for general treatment recommendations, formal testing of mechanical thrombectomy versus best medical treatment in these patients in a randomized controlled trial is warranted.</jats:p></jats:sec>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • tomography
  • size-exclusion chromatography
  • chemical ionisation