Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Donovan, Jenny L.

  • Google
  • 8
  • 96
  • 2825

University of Bristol

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (8/8 displayed)

  • 2017Developing outcome measures assessing wound management and patient experience16citations
  • 2017Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) testing of men in UK general practice:40citations
  • 2017Alcohol consumption and prostate cancer incidence and progression35citations
  • 201610-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.2333citations
  • 2016Validating the use of hospital episode statistics data and comparison of costing methodologies for economic evaluation29citations
  • 2011Prostate-specific antigen testing rates remain low in UK general practice: A cross-sectional study in six English cities62citations
  • 2010Impact of prostate cancer testing: an evaluation of the emotional consequences of a negative biopsy result86citations
  • 2008Prostate-cancer mortality in the USA and UK in 1975 - 2004: an ecological study224citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Macefield, Rhiannon
2 / 3 shared
Blazeby, Jane
2 / 3 shared
Oliver, Steven
1 / 1 shared
Turner, Emma
4 / 6 shared
Metcalfe, Chris
5 / 6 shared
Neal, David
1 / 1 shared
Young, Grace
1 / 1 shared
Ben-Shlomo, Yoav
1 / 2 shared
Evans, Simon
1 / 2 shared
Hamdy, Freddie
1 / 2 shared
Harrison, Sean
1 / 2 shared
Martin, Richard
6 / 11 shared
Lane, Athene
4 / 4 shared
Walsh, Eleanor
3 / 3 shared
Neal, David E.
2 / 2 shared
Mason, Malcolm
1 / 1 shared
Davis, Michael
1 / 2 shared
Hamdy, Freddie C.
2 / 2 shared
Peters, Tj
1 / 3 shared
Verne, Julia E. C. W.
1 / 1 shared
Group, The Cap Trial
1 / 1 shared
Down, Liz
1 / 2 shared
Thorn, Joanna
1 / 1 shared
Hounsome, Luke
1 / 1 shared
Noble, Sian
1 / 1 shared
Neal, De
2 / 2 shared
Williams, N.
1 / 3 shared
Hughes, Lj
1 / 1 shared
Hamdy, Fc
2 / 2 shared
Avery, Kerry
1 / 2 shared
Down, L.
1 / 1 shared
Vedhara, K.
1 / 1 shared
Gunnell, David
1 / 1 shared
Collin, S. M.
1 / 1 shared
Albertsen, P.
1 / 1 shared
Stephens, P.
1 / 1 shared
Moore, R.
1 / 2 shared
Neal, D.
1 / 1 shared
Hamdy, F.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2017
2016
2011
2010
2008

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Macefield, Rhiannon
  • Blazeby, Jane
  • Oliver, Steven
  • Turner, Emma
  • Metcalfe, Chris
  • Neal, David
  • Young, Grace
  • Ben-Shlomo, Yoav
  • Evans, Simon
  • Hamdy, Freddie
  • Harrison, Sean
  • Martin, Richard
  • Lane, Athene
  • Walsh, Eleanor
  • Neal, David E.
  • Mason, Malcolm
  • Davis, Michael
  • Hamdy, Freddie C.
  • Peters, Tj
  • Verne, Julia E. C. W.
  • Group, The Cap Trial
  • Down, Liz
  • Thorn, Joanna
  • Hounsome, Luke
  • Noble, Sian
  • Neal, De
  • Williams, N.
  • Hughes, Lj
  • Hamdy, Fc
  • Avery, Kerry
  • Down, L.
  • Vedhara, K.
  • Gunnell, David
  • Collin, S. M.
  • Albertsen, P.
  • Stephens, P.
  • Moore, R.
  • Neal, D.
  • Hamdy, F.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Validating the use of hospital episode statistics data and comparison of costing methodologies for economic evaluation

  • Neal, David E.
  • Verne, Julia E. C. W.
  • Group, The Cap Trial
  • Down, Liz
  • Thorn, Joanna
  • Turner, Emma
  • Hounsome, Luke
  • Martin, Richard
  • Hamdy, Freddie C.
  • Noble, Sian
  • Donovan, Jenny L.
  • Walsh, Eleanor
Abstract

<p><strong>Objectives</strong> To evaluate the accuracy of routine data for costing inpatient resource use in a large clinical trial and to investigatecosting methodologies.</p><p><strong>Design</strong> Final-year inpatient cost profiles were derived using (1) data extracted from medical records mapped to the National HealthService (NHS) reference costs via service codes and (2) Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data using NHS reference costs.Trust finance departments were consulted to obtain costs for comparison purposes.</p><p><strong>Setting</strong> 7 UK secondary care centres.</p><p><strong>Population</strong> A subsample of 292 men identified as having died at least a year after being diagnosed with prostate cancer in Cluster randomisedtriAl of PSA testing for Prostate cancer (CAP), a long-running trial to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectivenessof prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing.</p><p><strong>Results</strong> Both inpatient cost profiles showed a rise in costs in the months leading up to death, and were broadly similar. The differencein mean inpatient costs was £899, with HES data yielding ∼8% lower costs than medical record data (differences compatiblewith chance, p=0.3). Events were missing from both data sets. 11 men (3.8%) had events identified in HES that were all missingfrom medical record review, while 7 men (2.4%) had events identified in medical record review that were all missing from HES.The response from finance departments to requests for cost data was poor: only 3 of 7 departments returned adequate data setswithin 6 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions</strong> Using HES routine data coupled with NHS reference costs resulted in mean annual inpatient costs that were very similar tothose derived via medical record review; therefore, routinely available data can be used as the primary method of costingresource use in large clinical trials. Neither HES nor medical record review represent gold standards of data collection.Requesting cost data from finance departments is impractical for large clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number</strong> ISRCTN92187251; Pre-results.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • cluster
  • gold