Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Pinho, Sofia S.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 28

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2021Carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK in implant dentistry28citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Henriques, Bruno
1 / 64 shared
Silva, Filipe S.
1 / 36 shared
Braz, Maria Pranto
1 / 1 shared
Matias De Souza, Júlio César
1 / 75 shared
Chart of publication period
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Henriques, Bruno
  • Silva, Filipe S.
  • Braz, Maria Pranto
  • Matias De Souza, Júlio César
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK in implant dentistry

  • Henriques, Bruno
  • Silva, Filipe S.
  • Pinho, Sofia S.
  • Braz, Maria Pranto
  • Matias De Souza, Júlio César
Abstract

<p>Objective: The aim of the present study was to perform an integrative systematic review on the stress distribution assessed by finite element analysis on dental implants or abutments composed of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK composites. Method: An electronic search was performed on PUBMED and ScienceDirect using a combination of the following search terms: PEEK, Polyetheretherketone, FEA, FEM, Finite element, Stress, Dental implant and Dental abutment. Results: The findings reported mechanical properties and the stress distribution through implant and abutment composed of PEEK and its fiber-reinforced composites. Unfilled PEEK revealed low values of elastic modulus and strength that negatively affected the stress distribution through the abutment and implant towards to the bone tisues. The incorporation of 30% carbon fibers increased the elastic modulus and strength of the PEEK-matrix composites although some studies reported no statistic differences in stress magnitude when compared to unfilled PEEK. However, an increase in short carbon fibers up to 60% revealed an enhancement on the stress distribution through abutment and implants towards to the bone tissues. PEEK veneering onto titanium core structures can also be a strategy to control the stress distribution at the implant-to-bone interface. Conclusions: The stiffness and strength of PEEK-matrix composites can be increased by the improvement of the carbon fibers’ network. Thus, the content, shape, dimensions, and chemical composition of fibers are key factors to improve the stress distribution through abutment and implants composed of PEEK-matrix composites.</p>

Topics
  • Carbon
  • strength
  • chemical composition
  • titanium
  • finite element analysis
  • fiber-reinforced composite