| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Zeman, Miro
Delft University of Technology
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (21/21 displayed)
- 2023Stable passivation of cut edges in encapsulated n-type silicon solar cells using Nafion polymercitations
- 2022Introducing a comprehensive physics-based modelling framework for tandem and other PV systemscitations
- 2022Raman spectroscopy of silicon with nanostructured surfacecitations
- 2022Thermal Stable High-Efficiency Copper Screen Printed Back Contact Solar Cellscitations
- 2022Achieving 23.83% conversion efficiency in silicon heterojunction solar cell with ultra-thin MoOx hole collector layer via tailoring (i)a-Si:H/MoOx interfacecitations
- 2021Design and optimization of hole collectors based on nc-SiOx:H for high-efficiency silicon heterojunction solar cellscitations
- 2021On current collection from supporting layers in perovskite/c-Si tandem solar cellscitations
- 2020Copper-Plating Metallization With Alternative Seed Layers for c-Si Solar Cells Embedding Carrier-Selective Passivating Contactscitations
- 2020Realizing the Potential of RF-Sputtered Hydrogenated Fluorine-Doped Indium Oxide as an Electrode Material for Ultrathin SiO x/Poly-Si Passivating Contactscitations
- 2019High temperature oxidation pre-treatment of textured c-Si wafers passivated by a-Si:Hcitations
- 2019Effective Passivation of Black Silicon Surfaces via Plasma-Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition Grown Conformal Hydrogenated Amorphous Silicon Layercitations
- 2018Poly-crystalline silicon-oxide films as carrier-selective passivating contacts for c-Si solar cellscitations
- 2017Poly-Si(O)x passivating contacts for high-efficiency c-Si IBC solar cellscitations
- 2017Electron tomography analysis of 3D interfacial nanostructures appearing in annealed Si rich SiC filmscitations
- 2017New insights into the nanostructure of innovative thin film solar cells gained by positron annihilation spectroscopycitations
- 2017Design and comparison of a 10-kW interleaved boost converter for PV application using Si and SiC devicescitations
- 2016TEM analysis of multilayered nanostructures formed in the rapid thermal annealed silicon rich silicon oxide film
- 2014Study of the effect of boron doping on the solid phase crystallisation of hydrogenated amorphous silicon films
- 2014Physical and chemical degradation behavior of sputtered aluminum doped zinc oxide layers for Cu(In,Ga)Se-2 solar cellscitations
- 2009Structural properties of amorphous silicon prepared from hydrogen diluted silanecitations
- 2000Challenges in amorphous silicon solar cell technology
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Introducing a comprehensive physics-based modelling framework for tandem and other PV systems
Abstract
<p>We introduce a novel simulation tool capable of calculating the energy yield of a PV system based on its fundamental material properties and using self-consistent models. Thus, our simulation model can operate without measurements of a PV device. It combines wave and ray optics and a dedicated semiconductor simulation to model the optoelectronic PV device properties resulting in the IV-curve. The system surroundings are described via spectrally resolved ray tracing resulting in a cell resolved irradiance distribution, and via the fluid dynamics-based thermal model, in the individual cell temperatures. A lumped-element model is used to calculate the IV-curves of each solar cell for every hour of the year. These are combined factoring in the interconnection to obtain the PV module IV-curves, which connect to the inverter for calculating the AC energy yield. In our case study, we compare two types of 2 terminal perovskite/silicon tandem modules with STC PV module efficiencies of 27.7% and 28.6% with a reference c-Si module with STC PV module efficiency of 20.9%. In four different climates, we show that tandem PV modules operate at 1–1.9 °C lower yearly irradiance weighted average temperatures compared to c-Si. We find that the effect of current mismatch is significantly overestimated in pure optical studies, as they do not account for fill factor gains. The specific yields in kWh/kWp of the tandem PV systems are between −2.7% and +0.4% compared to the reference c-Si system in all four simulated climates. Thus, we find that the lab performance of the simulated tandem PV system translates from the laboratory to outdoors comparable to c-Si systems.</p>