Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Depraetere, Robin

  • Google
  • 15
  • 9
  • 139

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (15/15 displayed)

  • 2024Damage evolution of a hydrogen charged grade X56 pipeline steel evaluated using X-ray micro-CT2citations
  • 2024The effect of hydrogen and notch orientation in SENT specimens on the fracture toughness of an API 5L X70 pipeline steel8citations
  • 2024Hydrogen-assisted degradation of an X70 pipeline steel evaluated by single edge notched tension testing1citations
  • 2023Modeling of hydrogen-charged notched tensile tests of an X70 pipeline steel with a hydrogen-informed Gurson model5citations
  • 2023Effect of stress triaxiality on the hydrogen embrittlement micromechanisms in a pipeline steel evaluated by fractographic analysis9citations
  • 2023Influence of stress triaxiality on hydrogen assisted ductile damage in an X70 pipeline steel20citations
  • 2022Characterization of hydrogen-assisted degradation of a vintage and a modern pipeline steelcitations
  • 2022Single edge notched tension testing for assessing hydrogen embrittlement : a numerical study of test parameter influences4citations
  • 2022Hydrogen embrittlement in pipeline steels and weldscitations
  • 2022Influence of electrochemical hydrogenation parameters on microstructures prone to hydrogen-induced cracking26citations
  • 2022Effect of hydrogen charging on Charpy impact toughness of an X70 pipeline steel6citations
  • 2021Fully-coupled continuum damage model for simulation of plasticity dominated hydrogen embrittlement mechanisms26citations
  • 2021Fully-coupled continuum damage model for simulation of plasticity dominated hydrogen embrittlement mechanisms26citations
  • 2020Calibrating a ductile damage model for two pipeline steels : method and challenges3citations
  • 2020Calibrating a ductile damage model for two pipeline steels : method and challenges3citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Verbeken, Kim
13 / 154 shared
De Waele, Wim
13 / 78 shared
Cauwels, Margo
13 / 13 shared
Depover, Tom
13 / 82 shared
Hertelé, Stijn
15 / 45 shared
Boone, Matthieu
1 / 9 shared
Claeys, Lisa
1 / 22 shared
De Pue, Laura
1 / 2 shared
Waele, Wim De
2 / 30 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Verbeken, Kim
  • De Waele, Wim
  • Cauwels, Margo
  • Depover, Tom
  • Hertelé, Stijn
  • Boone, Matthieu
  • Claeys, Lisa
  • De Pue, Laura
  • Waele, Wim De
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Calibrating a ductile damage model for two pipeline steels : method and challenges

  • Verbeken, Kim
  • Cauwels, Margo
  • Depover, Tom
  • Depraetere, Robin
  • Hertelé, Stijn
  • Waele, Wim De
Abstract

This work is part of a project that aims to develop a micromechanics based damage law taking into account hydrogen assisted degradation. A 'vintage' API 5L X56N and a 'modern' API 5L X70M pipeline steel have been selected for this purpose. The paper focuses on an experimental calibration of ductile damage properties of the well known complete Gurson model for the two steels in absence of hydrogen. A basic microstructural characterization is provided, showing a banded ferrite-pearlite microstructure for both steels. Charpy impact tests showed splits at the fracture surface for the X70 steel. Double-notched round bar tensile tests are performed, aiming to provide the appropriate input for damage model calibration. The double-notched nature of the specimens allows to examine the material state at maximum load in the unfailed notch, and the final material state in the failed notch. Different notch radii are used, capturing a broad range of positive stress triaxialities. The notches are optically monitored for transverse necking in two perpendicular directions (transverse to rolling and through thickness) to reveal any anisotropy in plastic deformation and/or damage. It is explained how the occurrence of splits at the segregation zone, and anisotropy complicate the calibration procedure. Calibration is done for each steel and acceptable results are obtained. However, the occurrence of splits did not allow to evaluate the damage model for the highest levels of tested stress triaxiality.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • microstructure
  • surface
  • polymer
  • steel
  • Hydrogen
  • impact test