Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Da Silva, Lfrc

  • Google
  • 1
  • 6
  • 1

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2020Fatigue behaviour of bolted joints for rack structures1citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Correia, Jafo
1 / 56 shared
Lesiuk, G.
1 / 44 shared
Fernandes, Aa
1 / 34 shared
Figueiredo, Miguel
1 / 6 shared
De Jesus, Amp
1 / 92 shared
Gomes, Vmg
1 / 4 shared
Chart of publication period
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Correia, Jafo
  • Lesiuk, G.
  • Fernandes, Aa
  • Figueiredo, Miguel
  • De Jesus, Amp
  • Gomes, Vmg
OrganizationsLocationPeople

document

Fatigue behaviour of bolted joints for rack structures

  • Correia, Jafo
  • Lesiuk, G.
  • Fernandes, Aa
  • Figueiredo, Miguel
  • Da Silva, Lfrc
  • De Jesus, Amp
  • Gomes, Vmg
Abstract

Racking systems applied in logistics warehouses are built with thin steel sections that are joined by bolted connections. In fully automatic systems, these structures are loaded 7/7 days and 24/24 hours raising fatigue issues due to the cyclic nature of the resulting stresses. According to the current industrial practice, those bolted joints are tight with no torque control, leading to the concept of snug tight bolts, which behaves similarly to non-preloaded bolted joints. Eurocode 3 has no reference about fatigue rules of bolted connections between thin-walled cold formed steels. This paper aims at analyzing the fatigue behaviour of bolted (snug tight vs. preloaded) joints in order to provide fatigue design rules for possible update of Eurocode 3 existing rules. A significant fatigue testing program was performed to investigate the influence of different bolts arrangements, stress R-Ratios and bolt preloads, including snug tight, on fatigue life. The obtained results were analyzed under ASTM E739 procedure in order to obtain S-N curves. This work revealed an average fatigue strength of 114 MPa at 2E6 cycles for the snug tight bolted joints. Preloaded bolt joints presented an average fatigue strength of 108 MPa at 2E6 cycles. Discrepancies between S-N curves suggested by Eurocode 3 and fatigue data obtained experimentally were verified. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0) Peer-review under responsibility of the European Structural Integrity Society (ESIS) ExCo

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • strength
  • steel
  • fatigue
  • fatigue testing
  • electrospray ionisation