Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Figueiredo, Jcp

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 42

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2018Adhesive thickness influence on the shear fracture toughness measurements of adhesive joints42citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Campilho, Rdsg
1 / 12 shared
Da Silva, Lfm
1 / 36 shared
Machado, Jjm
1 / 19 shared
Marques, Eas
1 / 26 shared
Chart of publication period
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Campilho, Rdsg
  • Da Silva, Lfm
  • Machado, Jjm
  • Marques, Eas
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Adhesive thickness influence on the shear fracture toughness measurements of adhesive joints

  • Campilho, Rdsg
  • Da Silva, Lfm
  • Machado, Jjm
  • Figueiredo, Jcp
  • Marques, Eas
Abstract

To increase the confidence in the design of bonded structures, it is important to accurately predict their mechanical strength. In this context, Fracture and Damage Mechanics approaches have significant advantages over Continuum Mechanics. The Fracture Mechanics approach is often applied by an energetic analysis, where the main parameter to predict the evolution of damage and failure is the critical strain energy release rate (G(C)). This parameter can also be divided into the tensile (G(IC)) and shear (G(IIC)) components. Cohesive Zone Models (CZM) are a powerful strength prediction technique within the scope of Fracture Mechanics and take advantage of cohesive laws to induce crack growth in the numerical models. This work aims to estimate G(IIC) of adhesive joints of composite structures by the End-Notched Flexure (ENF) test, considering different values of adhesive thickness (t(A)). In this context, different data reduction methods to estimate G(IIC) are compared. On the other hand, the shear cohesive laws of the adhesive layer are obtained by the Finite Element Method (FEM) and CZM using an inverse technique, enabling to understand the influence of t(A) on the joints' shear behaviour. The numerical models accurately captured the observed experimental behaviour of the adhesive. A clear dependency was found regarding both G(IIC) and the shear cohesive strength (t(g)(0)), depending on t(A).

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • crack
  • strength
  • composite
  • fracture toughness
  • ion chromatography