| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Da Silva, Lfm
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (36/36 displayed)
- 2023Study on out-of-plane tensile strength of angle-plied reinforced hybrid CFRP laminates using thin-plycitations
- 2023Damage Metrics for Void Detection in Adhesive Single-Lap Jointscitations
- 2022A study of the fracture mechanisms of hybrid carbon fiber reinforced polymer laminates reinforced by thin-plycitations
- 2022Damage Classification Methodology Utilizing Lamb Waves and Artificial Neural Networkscitations
- 2021Design of a new pneumatic impact actuator of a Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) setup for tensile and compression testing of structural adhesivescitations
- 2021Determination of fracture toughness of an adhesive in civil engineering and interfacial damage analysis of carbon fiber reinforced polymer-steel structure bonded jointscitations
- 2021Novel torsion machine to test adhesive jointscitations
- 2020Geometrical optimization of adhesive joints under tensile impact loads using cohesive zone modellingcitations
- 2020Numerical study of mode I fracture toughness of carbon-fibre-reinforced plastic under an impact loadcitations
- 2020Numerical study of similar and dissimilar single lap joints under quasi-static and impact conditionscitations
- 2020Experimental and numerical study of the dynamic response of an adhesively bonded automotive structurecitations
- 2019Adhesive joint analysis under tensile impact loads by cohesive zone modellingcitations
- 2019Dynamic behaviour in mode I fracture toughness of CFRP as a function of temperaturecitations
- 2019A strategy to reduce delamination of adhesive joints with composite substratescitations
- 2018Improvement in impact strength of composite joints for the automotive industrycitations
- 2018Adhesives and adhesive joints under impact loadings: An overviewcitations
- 2018Mechanical behaviour of adhesively bonded composite single lap joints under quasi-static and impact conditions with variation of temperature and overlapcitations
- 2018Numerical study of the behaviour of composite mixed adhesive joints under impact strength for the automotive industrycitations
- 2018Adhesive thickness influence on the shear fracture toughness measurements of adhesive jointscitations
- 2017Toughness of a brittle epoxy resin reinforced with micro cork particles: Effect of size, amount and surface treatmentcitations
- 2017Multiobjective optimization of mechanical properties based on the composition of adhesivescitations
- 2017Analysis of the effect of size, amount and surface treatment on the tensile strain of a brittle adhesive reinforced with micro cork particlescitations
- 2017Mode II fracture toughness of CFRP as a function of temperature and strain ratecitations
- 2017Mode I fracture toughness of CFRP as a function of temperature and strain ratecitations
- 2017Dynamic behaviour of composite adhesive joints for the automotive industrycitations
- 2016Optimal design of adhesive composition in footwear industry based on creep rate minimizationcitations
- 2015Surface treatment effect in thermoplastic rubber and natural leather for the footwear industrycitations
- 2015Effect of the surface treatment in polyurethane and natural leather for the footwear industrycitations
- 2014Effect of Cure Temperature on the Glass Transition Temperature and Mechanical Properties of Epoxy Adhesivescitations
- 2013Effect of post-cure on the glass transition temperature and mechanical properties of epoxy adhesivescitations
- 2013Characterization of Aluminium Single-Lap Joints for High Temperature Applicationscitations
- 2012EFFECT OF CURE TEMPERATURE ON THE GLASS TRANSITION TEMPERATURE OF AN EPOXY ADHESIVE
- 2011Strength prediction of single- and double-lap joints by standard and extended finite element modellingcitations
- 2010Comparison of the Mechanical Behaviour Between Stiff and Flexible Adhesive Joints for the Automotive Industrycitations
- 2010Correlation analysis of MAC robotized welding parameters by the Taguchi technique
- 2006Effect of adhesive type and thickness on the lap shear strengthcitations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Strength prediction of single- and double-lap joints by standard and extended finite element modelling
Abstract
The structural integrity of multi-component structures is usually determined by the strength and durability of their unions. Adhesive bonding is often chosen over welding, riveting and bolting, due to the reduction of stress concentrations, reduced weight penalty and easy manufacturing, amongst other issues. In the past decades, the Finite Element Method (FEM) has been used for the simulation and strength prediction of bonded structures, by strength of materials or fracture mechanics-based criteria. Cohesive-zone models (CZMs) have already proved to be an effective tool in modelling damage growth, surpassing a few limitations of the aforementioned techniques. Despite this fact, they still suffer from the restriction of damage growth only at predefined growth paths. The eXtended Finite Element Method (XFEM) is a recent improvement of the FEM, developed to allow the growth of discontinuities within bulk solids along an arbitrary path, by enriching degrees of freedom with special displacement functions, thus overcoming the main restriction of CZMs. These two techniques were tested to simulate adhesively bonded single- and double-lap joints. The comparative evaluation of the two methods showed their capabilities and/or limitations for this specific purpose.