| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Slomberg, Danielle L.
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (1/1 displayed)
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Release and fate of nanoparticulate TiO2 UV filters from sunscreen: Effects of particle coating and formulation type
Abstract
Nanoparticulate mineral UV filters, such as titanium dioxide (TiO 2) nanocomposites, are being increasingly used in sunscreens as an alternative to organic UV filters. However, there is still a lack of understanding regarding their fate and behavior in aquatic environments and potential environmental impacts after being released from a bather's skin during recreational activities. In this work, we assessed the release, fate, and transformation of two commercial nanocomposite TiO 2 UV filters, one hydrophobic and one hydrophilic, in ultrapure water and simulated fresh-and seawater. The hydrophobic TiO 2 nanocomposite, T-SA, was coated with a primary Al 2 O 3 photopassivation layer and a secondary stearic acid layer, while the hydrophilic TiO 2 nanocomposite, T-SiO 2 , was coated with a single SiO 2 photopassivation layer. The influence of the sunscreen formulation was examined by dispersing the TiO 2 nanocomposites in their typical continuous phase (i.e., oil for T-SA and water for T-SiO 2) before introduction into the aqueous system. After 48 h of aqueous aging and 48 h of settling, 88e99% of the hydrophobic T-SA remained floating on top of the water column in all aqueous systems. On the other hand, 100% of the hydrophilic T-SiO 2 settled out of the water column in the fresh-and seawaters. With respect to the photopassivation coatings, no loss of the T-SA Al 2 O 3 layer was detected after aqueous aging, but 99e100% dissolution of the SiO 2 layer on the T-SiO 2 nanocomposite was observed after 48 h in the fresh-and seawaters. This dissolution left behind T-SiO 2 by-products exhibiting a photocatalytic activity similar to that of bare rutile TiO 2. Overall, the results demonstrated that the TiO 2 surface coating and sunscreen formulation type drive environmental behavior and fate and that loss of the passivation layer can result in potentially harmful, photoactive by-products. These insights will help guide regulations and assist manufacturers in developing more environmentally safe sunscreens.