Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Rebulla, Sergio Minera

  • Google
  • 11
  • 8
  • 134

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (11/11 displayed)

  • 2019Efficient 3D Stress Capture of Variable-Stiffness and Sandwich Beam Structures13citations
  • 2019Comparing the effect of geometry and stiffness on the effective load paths in non-symmetric laminatescitations
  • 2019Geometrically nonlinear finite element model for predicting failure in composite structures6citations
  • 2019On the accuracy of localised 3D stress fields in tow-steered laminated composite structures19citations
  • 2018Three-dimensional stress analysis for laminated composite and sandwich structures53citations
  • 2018Three-dimensional stress analysis for beam-like structures using Serendipity Lagrange shape functions33citations
  • 2017On the accuracy of the displacement-based Unified Formulation for modelling laminated composite beam structurescitations
  • 2017Linearized buckling analysis of thin-walled structures using detailed three-dimensional stress fields8citations
  • 2017Continuum mechanics of beam-like structures using onedimensional finite elements based on Serendipity Lagrange cross-sectional discretisations2citations
  • 20173D stress analysis for complex cross-section beams using unified formulation based on Serendipity Lagrange polynomial expansioncitations
  • 2017A Computationally Efficient Model for Three-dimensional Stress Analysis of Stiffened Curved Panelscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Weaver, Pm
11 / 560 shared
Groh, Rainer Mj
3 / 45 shared
Patni, Mayank
11 / 14 shared
Pirrera, Alberto
11 / 85 shared
Odonnell, Matthew Philip
1 / 12 shared
Bisagni, Chiara
1 / 13 shared
Carrera, Erasmo
2 / 28 shared
Petrolo, Marco
1 / 11 shared
Chart of publication period
2019
2018
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Weaver, Pm
  • Groh, Rainer Mj
  • Patni, Mayank
  • Pirrera, Alberto
  • Odonnell, Matthew Philip
  • Bisagni, Chiara
  • Carrera, Erasmo
  • Petrolo, Marco
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Three-dimensional stress analysis for laminated composite and sandwich structures

  • Weaver, Pm
  • Rebulla, Sergio Minera
  • Groh, Rainer Mj
  • Patni, Mayank
  • Pirrera, Alberto
Abstract

<p>Accurate stress prediction in composite laminates is crucial for safe design under different loading conditions. Classical laminated theory, i.e. those based on the Euler-Bernoulli and Kirchhoff hypotheses, respectively for beams and plates/shells are inaccurate for relatively thick laminates as three-dimensional (3D) effects such as transverse shear and normal deformations are neglected. Therefore, 3D finite element models are often employed for accurate stress analysis. However, these models are computationally expensive when used for laminates with a large number of layers, in optimisation studies, or for non-linear analyses. To address this issue, a Unified Formulation approach is presented for the analysis of laminated, slender beam-like structures. To define the kinematic field over the beam's cross-section, a recently developed hierarchical set of expansion functions, based on Serendipity Lagrange expansions, are employed and adapted to the layer-wise approach. The present formulation, which has displacements as degrees of freedom, does not ensure continuous transverse stresses across layer interfaces. Thus, an extra post-processing step is required to capture these stresses accurately. The proposed model is benchmarked against a 3D closed-form solution, 3D finite elements, and results available in the literature by means of static analyses of highly heterogeneous, laminated composite and sandwich beams. A key advantage of the present model is its ability to predict accurate 3D stress fields efficiently, including boundary layer regions, i.e. towards clamped ends. As a result, global analyses (e.g. overall displacements, buckling, etc.) and local analyses (e.g. stress concentrations) are combined within a single, computationally efficient model. The performance of the proposed approach, in terms of computational cost and precision, is assessed. Significant computational efficiency gains over 3D finite elements are observed for similar levels of accuracy.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • theory
  • composite