Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Dunlop, D. G.

  • Google
  • 4
  • 19
  • 105

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2018Human skeletal stem cell response to multiscale topography induced by large area electron beam melting surface treatment19citations
  • 2014A comparison of polymer and polymer-hydroxyapatite composite tissue engineered scaffolds for use in bone regeneration. An in vitro and in vivo study.54citations
  • 2012Supercritical CO2 fluid-foaming of polymers to increase porosity: a method to improve the mechanical and biocompatibility characteristics for use as a potential alternative to allografts in impaction bone grafting?32citations
  • 2007Improving both the biological and mechanical properties of allograft in impaction bone grafting: a role for human bone marrow stromal cellscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Cook, Richard
1 / 6 shared
Gorianov, Vitaly
1 / 1 shared
Clare, Adam
1 / 8 shared
Walker, John
1 / 5 shared
Briscoe, Adam
1 / 3 shared
Tayton, E.
1 / 1 shared
Aarvold, Alexander
1 / 2 shared
Shakesheff, K. M.
1 / 4 shared
Smith, J. O.
2 / 2 shared
Howdle, S. M.
2 / 10 shared
Purcell, M.
2 / 2 shared
Kanczler, Janos
1 / 8 shared
Shakesheff, K.
1 / 1 shared
Briscoe, A.
1 / 1 shared
Kalra, S.
1 / 1 shared
Tayton, Edward
1 / 2 shared
Aarvold, A.
1 / 2 shared
Bolland, B. J. R. F.
1 / 1 shared
New, A. M. R.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2018
2014
2012
2007

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Cook, Richard
  • Gorianov, Vitaly
  • Clare, Adam
  • Walker, John
  • Briscoe, Adam
  • Tayton, E.
  • Aarvold, Alexander
  • Shakesheff, K. M.
  • Smith, J. O.
  • Howdle, S. M.
  • Purcell, M.
  • Kanczler, Janos
  • Shakesheff, K.
  • Briscoe, A.
  • Kalra, S.
  • Tayton, Edward
  • Aarvold, A.
  • Bolland, B. J. R. F.
  • New, A. M. R.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Supercritical CO2 fluid-foaming of polymers to increase porosity: a method to improve the mechanical and biocompatibility characteristics for use as a potential alternative to allografts in impaction bone grafting?

  • Shakesheff, K.
  • Briscoe, A.
  • Kalra, S.
  • Smith, J. O.
  • Howdle, S. M.
  • Purcell, M.
  • Tayton, Edward
  • Dunlop, D. G.
  • Aarvold, A.
Abstract

Disease transmission, availability and cost of allografts have resulted in significant efforts to find an alternative for use in impaction bone grafting (IBG). Recent studies identified two polymers with both structural strength and biocompatibility characteristics as potential replacements. The aim of this study was to assess whether increasing the polymer porosity further enhanced the mechanical and cellular compatibility characteristics for use as an osteogenic biomaterial alternative to allografts in IBG. Solid and porous poly(DL-lactide) (P(DL)LA) and poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) (P(DL)LGA) scaffolds were produced via melt processing and supercritical CO(2) foaming, and the differences characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Mechanical testing included milling and impaction, with comparisons made using a shear testing rig as well as a novel agitation test for cohesion. Cellular compatibility tests for cell number, viability, and osteogenic differentiation using WST-1 assays, fluorostaining, and ALP assays were determined following 14 day culture with skeletal stem cells. SEM showed excellent porosity throughout both of the supercritical-foam-produced polymer scaffolds, with pores between 50 and 200 ?m. Shear testing showed that the porous polymers exceeded the shear strength of allograft controls (P<0.001). Agitation testing showed greater cohesion between the particles of the porous polymers (P<0.05). Cellular studies showed increased cell number, viability, and osteogenic differentiation on the porous polymers compared to solid block polymers (P<0.05). The use of supercritical CO(2) to generate porous polymeric biodegradable scaffolds significantly improves the cellular compatibility and cohesion observed compared to non-porous counterparts, without substantial loss of mechanical shear strength. These improved characteristics are critical for clinical translation as a potential osteogenic composite for use in IBG.

Topics
  • porous
  • pore
  • polymer
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • melt
  • grinding
  • milling
  • strength
  • composite
  • porosity
  • biocompatibility