Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Luimes, R. A.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 13

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2019Collapse response of two-dimensional cellular solids by plasticity and cracking13citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Suiker, Asj Akke
1 / 21 shared
Jorissen, A. J. M.
1 / 1 shared
Bosco, Emanuela
1 / 10 shared
Scheperboer, Irene C.
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2019

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Suiker, Asj Akke
  • Jorissen, A. J. M.
  • Bosco, Emanuela
  • Scheperboer, Irene C.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Collapse response of two-dimensional cellular solids by plasticity and cracking

  • Suiker, Asj Akke
  • Jorissen, A. J. M.
  • Bosco, Emanuela
  • Scheperboer, Irene C.
  • Luimes, R. A.
Abstract

<p>The competition between fracture and plasticity in periodic hexagonal honeycomb structures subjected to (i) intercell cracking, (ii) intrawall cracking and (iii) transwall cracking is examined, and their effect upon the macroscopic collapse response is explored using dedicated FEM analyses of unit cell configurations. These three cracking mechanisms are regularly observed in wood microstructures, and insight into their influence on the macroscopic collapse behavior is necessary for adequately designing timber structures against failure. The numerical results are presented by means of collapse contours in the hydrostatic-deviatoric stress space, illustrating the effects of wall slenderness, relative fracture (versus yield) strength, and the relative size of the plastic zone at the crack tip. Both the hydrostatic and deviatoric collapse strengths of the honeycomb strongly increase in the transition from brittle cell walls with low relative fracture strength to ductile cell walls with high relative fracture strength. This strength increase typically changes the shape of the collapse contour, and is the largest for transwall cracking, followed by intercell cracking and finally intrawall cracking. The ultimate collapse strength of the honeycomb is significantly more sensitive to the fracture strength than to the fracture toughness of the cell walls, and correctly approaches the plastic yield surface under increasing relative fracture strength. The numerical results may serve as a useful guideline in the experimental calibration of the local fracture and yield strengths of cell walls in wood.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • microstructure
  • surface
  • polymer
  • crack
  • strength
  • two-dimensional
  • plasticity
  • yield strength
  • wood
  • fracture toughness