People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Reali, Alessandro
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (18/18 displayed)
- 2024Data‐informed uncertainty quantification for laser‐based powder bed fusion additive manufacturingcitations
- 2021An immersed boundary approach for residual stress evaluation in selective laser melting processescitations
- 2015An Efficient Finite Element Framework to Assess Flexibility Performances of SMA Self-Expandable Carotid Artery Stentscitations
- 2015A phenomenological model for the magneto-mechanical response of single-crystal Magnetic Shape Memory Alloyscitations
- 2015A phenomenological model for the magneto-mechanical response of single-crystal magnetic shape memory alloyscitations
- 2013Statistical finite element analysis of the buckling behavior of honeycomb structurescitations
- 2011On the robustness and efficiency of integration algorithms for a 3D finite strain phenomenological SMA constitutive modelcitations
- 2011An improved, fully symmetric, finite-strain phenomenological constitutive model for shape memory alloyscitations
- 2010A 3-D phenomenological constitutive model for shape memory alloys under multiaxial loadingscitations
- 2010On the constitutive modeling and numerical implementation of shape memory alloys under multiaxial loadings - Part II: numerical implementation and simulations
- 2010On the constitutive modeling and numerical implementation of shape memory alloys under multiaxial loadings - Part I: constitutivemodel development at small and finite strains
- 2010An efficient, non-regularized solution algorithm for a finite strain shape memory alloy constitutive model
- 2010A 3D finite strain phenomenological constitutive model for shape memory alloys considering martensite reorientationcitations
- 2009A macroscopic 1D model for shape memory alloys including asymmetric behaviors and transformation-dependent elastic propertiescitations
- 2008Shape Memory Alloys: Material Modeling and Device Finite Element Simulationscitations
- 2007A Phenomenological One-dimensional Model Describing Stress-induced Solid Phase Transformation with Permanent Inelasticitycitations
- 2007A Three-dimensional Model Describing Stress-induced Solid Phase Transformation with Permanent Inelasticitycitations
- 2007A Phenomenological 3D Model Describing Stress-induced Solid Phase Transformations with Permanent Inelasticitycitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Data‐informed uncertainty quantification for laser‐based powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>We present an efficient approach to quantify the uncertainties associated with the numerical simulations of the laser‐based powder bed fusion of metals processes. Our study focuses on a thermomechanical model of an Inconel 625 cantilever beam, based on the AMBench2018‐01 benchmark proposed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The proposed approach consists of a forward uncertainty quantification analysis of the residual strains of the cantilever beam given the uncertainty in some of the parameters of the numerical simulation, namely the powder convection coefficient and the activation temperature. The uncertainty on such parameters is modelled by a data‐informed probability density function obtained by a Bayesian inversion procedure, based on the displacement experimental data provided by NIST. To overcome the computational challenges of both the Bayesian inversion and the forward uncertainty quantification analysis we employ a multi‐fidelity surrogate modelling technique, specifically the multi‐index stochastic collocation method. The proposed approach allows us to achieve a 33% reduction in the uncertainties on the prediction of residual strains compared with what we would get basing the forward UQ analysis on a‐priori ranges for the uncertain parameters, and in particular the mode of the probability density function of such quantities (i.e., its “most likely value”, roughly speaking) results to be in good agreement with the experimental data provided by NIST, even though only displacement data were used for the Bayesian inversion procedure.</jats:p>